Nerq found 793 MCP servers for testing & qa, ranked below by GitHub stars and weighted compliance score across 52 global AI jurisdictions. The top-ranked MCP server for testing & qa is cyproxio/mcp-for-security with 553 stars and a trust score of 74/100. MCP servers for automated testing, quality assurance, and test management.
793 servers in this category | Data from Nerq| # | Name | Stars | Trust | Author | License | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cyproxio/mcp-for-security | 553 | B 74 | cyproxio | MIT | |
| 2 | pentest-mcp | 115 | B 71 | DMontgomery40 | MIT | |
| 3 | terminator | 1,279 | B 70 | mediar-ai | N/A | |
| 4 | promptfoo/evil-mcp-server | 20 | C 69 | promptfoo | MIT | |
| 5 | mcp-server-browserbase | 3,116 | C 69 | browserbase | N/A | |
| 6 | rf-mcp | 65 | C 68 | manykarim | Apache-2.0 | |
| 7 | RedNote-MCP-Plus | 2 | C 68 | MrMao007 | MIT | |
| 8 | fetcher-mcp | 977 | C 67 | jae-jae | N/A | |
| 9 | awesome-mcp-devtools | 413 | C 67 | punkpeye | N/A | |
| 10 | Vasco0x4/AIDA | 183 | C 66 | Vasco0x4 | AGPL-3.0 | |
| 11 | modelcontextprotocol/inspector | 8,761 | C 66 | modelcontextprotocol | NOASSERTION | |
| 12 | hoot | 14 | C 66 | Portkey-AI | MIT | |
| 13 | seoctopus | 1 | C 66 | itsjwill | MIT | |
| 14 | io.github.seleniumbase/seleniumbase | 0 | B- 65 | https://github.com/seleniumbase/SeleniumBase | N/A | |
| 15 | io.github.AlexKay28/clickcast | 0 | B- 65 | https://github.com/AlexKay28/clickcast | N/A | |
| 16 | io.github.ricfanin/netwright | 0 | B- 65 | https://github.com/ricfanin/netwright | N/A | |
| 17 | io.github.Weavatrix/weavatrix-quality | 0 | B- 65 | https://github.com/Weavatrix/weavatrix-quality | N/A | |
| 18 | mcp-fail-server | 0 | C 65 | dastrobu | Apache-2.0 | |
| 19 | Juejin-MCP-Server | 0 | C 65 | Arlowen | Apache-2.0 | |
| 20 | mcp-learning-adapter | 0 | C 65 | babydoll1110 | MIT |
MCP servers for automated testing, quality assurance, and test management. Nerq tracks 793 MCP servers in the testing & qa category, each assessed against 52 global AI regulations including the EU AI Act, US state AI laws (California SB53, Colorado SB205), UK AI Bill, and more. Compliance scores are weighted by jurisdiction penalty severity — jurisdictions with higher fines (like the EU AI Act at up to €35M) have more impact on the score than voluntary frameworks.
All data is updated regularly. Use the Nerq API or MCP Server for programmatic access.