Nerq found 68 MCP servers for slack integration, ranked below by GitHub stars and weighted compliance score across 52 global AI jurisdictions. The top-ranked MCP server for slack integration is NCP (MCP Orchestrator) with 79 stars and a trust score of 72/100. MCP servers for Slack: send messages, manage channels, automate workflows in Slack workspaces.
Last updated: May 01, 2026 | 68 servers in this category | Data from Nerq| # | Name | Stars | Trust | Author | License | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NCP (MCP Orchestrator) | 79 | B 72 | https://github.com/portel-dev/ncp | N/A | |
| 2 | slack-mcp-server | 1 | B 71 | Chisanan232 | N/A | |
| 3 | slack-mcp-server | 13 | B 71 | jtalk22 | N/A | |
| 4 | rusq/slackdump | 2,421 | B 70 | Unknown | N/A | |
| 5 | slack-fast-mcp | 0 | C 70 | kai-kou | N/A | |
| 6 | tuannvm/slack-mcp-client | 159 | C 69 | Unknown | N/A | |
| 7 | slack-mcp-server | 1,310 | B- 68 | korotovsky | N/A | |
| 8 | sansan0/TrendRadar | 46,674 | B- 68 | sansan0 | N/A | |
| 9 | io.github.0nork/0nMCP | 0 | B- 68 | https://github.com/0nork/0nMCP | N/A | |
| 10 | Agentic-MCP-Skill | 0 | C 67 | bioeu | N/A | |
| 11 | Pipedream | 11,137 | B- 67 | https://github.com/pipedreamhq/pipedream/tree/HEAD/modelcontextprotocol | N/A | |
| 12 | nirholas/mcp-notify | 15 | B- 67 | nirholas | MIT | |
| 13 | com.lassare/ask | 0 | B- 66 | https://github.com/lassare-hq/agent-configs | N/A | |
| 14 | slack-fast-mcp | 0 | C 66 | jeffmm | N/A | |
| 15 | slack-adhd-helper | 0 | C 66 | redaphid | N/A | |
| 16 | workspace-mcp | 0 | C 66 | NazarKY | N/A | |
| 17 | MCP-rag-with-Chromadb | 0 | C 64 | rexnzm | N/A | |
| 18 | Caboose | 0 | C+ 64 | https://github.com/caboose-mcp/caboose-mcp | N/A | |
| 19 | io.github.spark1security/n0s1-mcp | 0 | C+ 63 | Unknown | N/A | |
| 20 | mcp-slack-bridge | 0 | C 63 | DONGWAN-LEE | N/A |
MCP servers for Slack: send messages, manage channels, automate workflows in Slack workspaces. Nerq tracks 68 MCP servers in the slack integration category, each assessed against 52 global AI regulations including the EU AI Act, US state AI laws (California SB53, Colorado SB205), UK AI Bill, and more. Compliance scores are weighted by jurisdiction penalty severity — jurisdictions with higher fines (like the EU AI Act at up to €35M) have more impact on the score than voluntary frameworks.
All data is updated regularly. Use the Nerq API or MCP Server for programmatic access.