Nerq found 2,176 MCP servers for task automation & workflows, ranked below by GitHub stars and weighted compliance score across 52 global AI jurisdictions. The top-ranked MCP server for task automation & workflows is claude-kvm with 0 stars and a trust score of 76/100. MCP servers for automating tasks, scheduling jobs, and orchestrating complex workflows.
Last updated: May 01, 2026 | 2,176 servers in this category | Data from Nerq| # | Name | Stars | Trust | Author | License | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | claude-kvm | 0 | B 76 | ARAS-Workspace | MIT | |
| 2 | brave-scraper-mcp | 0 | B 75 | VishnuSuresh2000 | MIT | |
| 3 | Flux GitOps | 579 | B 74 | https://github.com/controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator | N/A | |
| 4 | Context Generator | 315 | B 74 | https://github.com/context-hub/generator | N/A | |
| 5 | remember | 0 | B 74 | Jozo132 | GPL-3.0 | |
| 6 | mcp-gh-pr-mini | 0 | B 74 | y-hirakaw | MIT | |
| 7 | MarkItDown | 92,814 | B 74 | https://github.com/canlgz/markitdown_mcp_server | N/A | |
| 8 | fibaro-mcp | 1 | B 73 | ikari-software | MIT | |
| 9 | aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket | 115 | B 73 | aashari | N/A | |
| 10 | mcp-automation-hub | 0 | B 73 | crystalclearhouse-data | MIT | |
| 11 | discord-mcp | 181 | B 72 | SaseQ | N/A | |
| 12 | homelab-mcp | 0 | B 72 | myraffy | N/A | |
| 13 | Claude-Code-Development-Kit | 1,310 | B 72 | peterkrueck | N/A | |
| 14 | applescript-mcp | 0 | B 72 | adamrdrew | GPL-3.0 | |
| 15 | ConstantineB6/comfy-pilot | 93 | B 72 | ConstantineB6 | N/A | |
| 16 | browser-use-recorder | 0 | B 72 | yksanjo | MIT | |
| 17 | GitHub Pages Documentation | 10 | B 72 | https://github.com/tosin2013/documcp | N/A | |
| 18 | Todoist Extended | 6 | B 72 | https://github.com/kydycode/todoist-mcp-server-ext | N/A | |
| 19 | google-sheets-mcp | 3 | B 72 | D-unn | MIT | |
| 20 | gcc | 0 | B 72 | CodeAdminDe | N/A |
MCP servers for automating tasks, scheduling jobs, and orchestrating complex workflows. Nerq tracks 2,176 MCP servers in the task automation & workflows category, each assessed against 52 global AI regulations including the EU AI Act, US state AI laws (California SB53, Colorado SB205), UK AI Bill, and more. Compliance scores are weighted by jurisdiction penalty severity — jurisdictions with higher fines (like the EU AI Act at up to €35M) have more impact on the score than voluntary frameworks.
All data is updated regularly. Use the Nerq API or MCP Server for programmatic access.