Nerq found 4,107 MCP servers for memory & context management, ranked below by GitHub stars and weighted compliance score across 52 global AI jurisdictions. The top-ranked MCP server for memory & context management is williamzujkowski/strudel-mcp-server with 158 stars and a trust score of 93/100. MCP servers for persistent memory, context management, and vector storage for AI agents.
Last updated: March 10, 2026 | 4,107 servers in this category | Data from Nerq| # | Name | Stars | Trust | Author | License | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | williamzujkowski/strudel-mcp-server | 158 | A+ 93 | williamzujkowski | MIT | |
| 2 | mcp-docs-service | 53 | A 88 | alekspetrov | MIT | |
| 3 | 54yyyu/zotero-mcp | 1,461 | A 88 | 54yyyu | MIT | |
| 4 | cyproxio/mcp-for-security | 553 | A 88 | cyproxio | MIT | |
| 5 | spences10/mcp-omnisearch | 271 | A 88 | spences10 | MIT | |
| 6 | Nekzus/npm-sentinel-mcp | 18 | A 86 | Nekzus | MIT | |
| 7 | mcp-manager | 280 | A 86 | amxv | MIT | |
| 8 | containers/kubernetes-mcp-server | 1,182 | A 85 | containers | Apache-2.0 | |
| 9 | gcloud-mcp | 653 | A 85 | googleapis | Apache-2.0 | |
| 10 | mcp-server-for-revit-python | 88 | A 85 | mcp-servers-for-revit | MIT | |
| 11 | mark3labs/mcphost | 1,559 | A 84 | mark3labs | MIT | |
| 12 | kimai_mcp | 17 | A 84 | glazperle | MIT | |
| 13 | bitbucket-mcp | 1 | A 84 | tugudush | MIT | |
| 14 | jalpp/chessagine-mcp | 18 | A 83 | jalpp | MIT | |
| 15 | simonkurtz-MSFT/drawio-mcp-server | 17 | A 83 | simonkurtz-MSFT | MIT | |
| 16 | cfdude/mac-shell-mcp | 17 | A 83 | cfdude | MIT | |
| 17 | bytemines/mycelium | 13 | A 83 | bytemines | MIT | |
| 18 | Cocoanetics/SwiftMCP | 119 | A 83 | Cocoanetics | BSD-2-Clause | |
| 19 | jira-mcp | 0 | A 83 | odesh009 | MIT | |
| 20 | trendmicro/vision-one-mcp-server | 27 | A 82 | trendmicro | MIT |
MCP servers for persistent memory, context management, and vector storage for AI agents. Nerq tracks 4,107 MCP servers in the memory & context management category, each assessed against 52 global AI regulations including the EU AI Act, US state AI laws (California SB53, Colorado SB205), UK AI Bill, and more. Compliance scores are weighted by jurisdiction penalty severity — jurisdictions with higher fines (like the EU AI Act at up to €35M) have more impact on the score than voluntary frameworks.
All data is updated regularly. Use the Nerq API or MCP Server for programmatic access.