Nerq found 6,019 MCP servers for api & workflow integration, ranked below by GitHub stars and weighted compliance score across 52 global AI jurisdictions. The top-ranked MCP server for api & workflow integration is grizzly-sms-mcp with 0 stars and a trust score of 76/100. MCP servers for connecting to external APIs, webhooks, and workflow automation platforms.
Last updated: April 29, 2026 | 6,019 servers in this category | Data from Nerq| # | Name | Stars | Trust | Author | License | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | grizzly-sms-mcp | 0 | B 76 | GrizzlySMS-Git | MIT | |
| 2 | FMS-ODATA-MCP | 3 | B 75 | fsans | MIT | |
| 3 | openclaw-hub | 0 | B 75 | openclaw-community | Apache-2.0 | |
| 4 | brave-scraper-mcp | 0 | B 75 | VishnuSuresh2000 | MIT | |
| 5 | ravitemer/mcphub.nvim | 1,723 | B 74 | Unknown | N/A | |
| 6 | coolify-mcp-server | 1 | B 74 | Softtor | MIT | |
| 7 | unai-unity-ai-connector | 1 | B 74 | experir | MIT | |
| 8 | Flux GitOps | 579 | B 74 | https://github.com/controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator | N/A | |
| 9 | Context Generator | 315 | B 74 | https://github.com/context-hub/generator | N/A | |
| 10 | remember | 0 | B 74 | Jozo132 | GPL-3.0 | |
| 11 | estat-mcp | 0 | B 74 | ajtgjmdjp | Apache-2.0 | |
| 12 | gemini-mcp | 0 | B 74 | yuraist | MIT | |
| 13 | mcp | 0 | B 74 | tinywasm | MIT | |
| 14 | ancplua-mcp | 0 | B 74 | ANcpLua | MIT | |
| 15 | mcp | 4 | B 74 | viant | Apache-2.0 | |
| 16 | gupshup-mcp | 0 | B 74 | ManmohanBuildsProducts | MIT | |
| 17 | mcp-gh-pr-mini | 0 | B 74 | y-hirakaw | MIT | |
| 18 | MarkItDown | 92,814 | B 74 | https://github.com/canlgz/markitdown_mcp_server | N/A | |
| 19 | context-window-manager | 0 | B 73 | mcp-tool-shop-org | N/A | |
| 20 | EvilFreelancer/openapi-to-mcp | 7 | B 73 | EvilFreelancer | MIT |
MCP servers for connecting to external APIs, webhooks, and workflow automation platforms. Nerq tracks 6,019 MCP servers in the api & workflow integration category, each assessed against 52 global AI regulations including the EU AI Act, US state AI laws (California SB53, Colorado SB205), UK AI Bill, and more. Compliance scores are weighted by jurisdiction penalty severity — jurisdictions with higher fines (like the EU AI Act at up to €35M) have more impact on the score than voluntary frameworks.
All data is updated regularly. Use the Nerq API or MCP Server for programmatic access.