Nerq found 824 MCP servers for github & git, ranked below by GitHub stars and weighted compliance score across 52 global AI jurisdictions. The top-ranked MCP server for github & git is Container Use with 3,687 stars and a trust score of 77/100. MCP servers for interacting with GitHub repositories, pull requests, issues, and code reviews.
Last updated: May 01, 2026 | 824 servers in this category | Data from Nerq| # | Name | Stars | Trust | Author | License | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Container Use | 3,687 | B+ 77 | https://github.com/dagger/container-use | N/A | |
| 2 | Sourcebot | 3,200 | B+ 77 | https://github.com/sourcebot-dev/sourcebot | N/A | |
| 3 | mcp | 289 | B 76 | oracle | UPL-1.0 | |
| 4 | Azure/aks-mcp | 115 | B 73 | Azure | N/A | |
| 5 | aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket | 115 | B 73 | aashari | N/A | |
| 6 | NCP (MCP Orchestrator) | 79 | B 72 | https://github.com/portel-dev/ncp | N/A | |
| 7 | GitHub Pages Documentation | 10 | B 72 | https://github.com/tosin2013/documcp | N/A | |
| 8 | gcc | 0 | B 72 | CodeAdminDe | N/A | |
| 9 | anyquery | 1,621 | B 72 | julien040 | N/A | |
| 10 | alphavantage/alpha_vantage_mcp | 82 | B 72 | alphavantage | N/A | |
| 11 | Mcp-Docker | 0 | B 72 | scottlz0310 | MIT | |
| 12 | git-conventional-commits | 0 | B 72 | jorelcb | Apache-2.0 | |
| 13 | anrgct/autodev-codebase | 110 | B 72 | Unknown | N/A | |
| 14 | gitlab-mcp-server | 0 | B 72 | 9506hqwy | BSD-3-Clause | |
| 15 | automation-workflows | 0 | B 72 | mendez1212 | N/A | |
| 16 | apappascs/mcp-servers-hub | 313 | B 71 | apappascs | N/A | |
| 17 | git-steer | 1 | B 71 | ry-ops | N/A | |
| 18 | mcp-review | 0 | B 71 | ethanasm | N/A | |
| 19 | git-mcp | 7,535 | B 71 | idosal | N/A | |
| 20 | shadcn/ui | 2,682 | B 70 | https://github.com/jpisnice/shadcn-ui-mcp-server | N/A |
MCP servers for interacting with GitHub repositories, pull requests, issues, and code reviews. Nerq tracks 824 MCP servers in the github & git category, each assessed against 52 global AI regulations including the EU AI Act, US state AI laws (California SB53, Colorado SB205), UK AI Bill, and more. Compliance scores are weighted by jurisdiction penalty severity — jurisdictions with higher fines (like the EU AI Act at up to €35M) have more impact on the score than voluntary frameworks.
All data is updated regularly. Use the Nerq API or MCP Server for programmatic access.