Nerq found 392 MCP servers for monitoring & observability, ranked below by GitHub stars and weighted compliance score across 52 global AI jurisdictions. The top-ranked MCP server for monitoring & observability is wems-mcp-server with 0 stars and a trust score of 84/100. MCP servers for monitoring systems, collecting metrics, and managing logs and alerts.
Last updated: March 10, 2026 | 392 servers in this category | Data from Nerq| # | Name | Stars | Trust | Author | License | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | wems-mcp-server | 0 | A 84 | heliosarchitect | MIT | |
| 2 | mcp-instana | 14 | A 84 | instana | Apache-2.0 | |
| 3 | mcp-youtube-intelligence | 0 | A 83 | JangHyuckYun | Apache-2.0 | |
| 4 | mongo-scout-mcp | 0 | A 83 | bluwork | ISC | |
| 5 | surfmon | 2 | A 83 | detailobsessed | MIT | |
| 6 | gensecaihq/Wazuh-MCP-Server | 126 | A 81 | gensecaihq | MIT | |
| 7 | f5xc-cloudstatus-mcp | 1 | A 81 | robinmordasiewicz | MIT | |
| 8 | erikdarlingdata/PerformanceMonitor | 169 | A 81 | erikdarlingdata | MIT | |
| 9 | github-mcp-server-devops | 2 | B 80 | tsviz | MIT | |
| 10 | observium-mcp | 1 | B 80 | kdesch5000 | MIT | |
| 11 | BerriAI/litellm | 36,444 | B 79 | BerriAI | NOASSERTION | |
| 12 | zabbix-mcp | 2 | B 79 | mhajder | MIT | |
| 13 | loki-reader-mcp | 0 | B 79 | jmazzahacks | N/A | |
| 14 | seoctopus | 1 | B 78 | itsjwill | MIT | |
| 15 | bareos-mcp-server | 1 | B 78 | edeckers | MPL-2.0 | |
| 16 | syphon1c/ai-security-gateway | 4 | B 76 | syphon1c | MIT | |
| 17 | spre-sre/lumino-mcp-server | 5 | B 76 | spre-sre | N/A | |
| 18 | librelink-mcp-server | 1 | B 76 | sedoglia | MIT | |
| 19 | datadog-mcp | 0 | B 75 | dreamiurg | N/A | |
| 20 | Variflight | 22 | B+ 75 | https://github.com/variflight/variflight-mcp | N/A |
MCP servers for monitoring systems, collecting metrics, and managing logs and alerts. Nerq tracks 392 MCP servers in the monitoring & observability category, each assessed against 52 global AI regulations including the EU AI Act, US state AI laws (California SB53, Colorado SB205), UK AI Bill, and more. Compliance scores are weighted by jurisdiction penalty severity — jurisdictions with higher fines (like the EU AI Act at up to €35M) have more impact on the score than voluntary frameworks.
All data is updated regularly. Use the Nerq API or MCP Server for programmatic access.