Independent risk rating for Maple Finance (syrup). Last updated 2026-03-12.
Is Maple Finance safe? ZARQ rates Maple Finance (syrup) Ba1 with a trust score of 49.6/100 and a 33% crash probability, based on 7 quantitative risk signals. Distance-to-Default: 2.8. Alert level: WARNING. 1 structural weakness signal active — elevated collapse risk. Vitality Score: 42/100 (Grade C), indicating crash resistance — backtested high-Vitality tokens lost 44% less during the 2025-2026 market crash (p < 0.001). Investors searching for Maple Finance safety information should note this rating is updated daily.
Vitality Score Breakdown
The ZARQ Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance across 5 dimensions. Maple Finance scores 42/100 (Grade C), indicating crash resistance — backtested high-Vitality tokens lost 44% less during the 2025–2026 market crash (p < 0.001). Backtested ✓ Methodology
Ecosystem Gravity50
Multi-chain presence, protocol count, DeFi depth
Capital Commitment24
TVL stability, locked capital, market cap rank
Coordination Efficiency40
Audit coverage, category diversity, yield density
Stress Resilience54
Drawdown recovery, NDD stability, crash probability
Organic Momentum36
Rating trend, NDD trend, volume momentum
Data confidence: 100%
Pillar 1 — Ecosystem Strength
65.0
Market cap rank, volume stability, activity. Higher is safer.
Pillar 2 — Contagion Risk
53.3
BTC correlation, beta exposure, idiosyncratic risk. Lower correlation = more independent.
Pillar 3 — Historical Resilience
50.0
Max drawdown recovery, annualized volatility, tail risk ratio.
Pillar 4 — Fundamental Quality
40.0
Token age, price consistency, long-term trend strength.
Pillar 5 — Rug Pull Risk
40.0
Anomaly detection, extreme move frequency, dump pattern screening.
Distance-to-Default (NDD)
2.8
Structural distance from default threshold. Below 2.0 = elevated distress.
Structural Signal (Sig6)
4.3
Structural integrity score from the DtD model. Lower values indicate structural weakness.
Strengths
✓Healthy distance from default (NDD: 2.8)
✓Daily automated risk monitoring by ZARQ
Risks
✗Elevated crash probability (33%)
✗1 structural weakness signal active
✗Active risk alert: WARNING
Maple Finance has an elevated crash probability of 33%, warranting extra caution. Minor structural stress has been detected (1 signal). The Distance-to-Default stands at 2.8, with an alert level of WARNING. Rating: Ba1. Vitality Score: 42/100 (Grade C).
Backtest resultsDisclaimer: This is quantitative risk analysis, not investment advice. Crypto assets are volatile and can lose value rapidly. Never invest more than you can afford to lose. ZARQ provides independent risk data — always do your own research before making investment decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Maple Finance safe to invest in?
Maple Finance (syrup) currently holds a Ba1 rating from ZARQ with a trust score of 49.6/100. This is a speculative-grade rating, indicating elevated risk. The current crash probability is 33%, and its Distance-to-Default stands at 2.8. Minor structural concerns are noted. Over the past 90 days, Maple Finance has experienced a 40.8% maximum drawdown. The alert level is WARNING. As with all crypto investments, you should conduct your own research and consider your risk tolerance.
What is Maple Finance's risk rating?
ZARQ rates Maple Finance at Ba1 on a Moody's-style scale (Aaa to C), where Baa3 and above is investment grade. The trust score is 49.6 out of 100, based on five quantitative pillars: ecosystem strength (65.0/100), contagion risk (53.3/100), historical resilience (50.0/100), fundamental quality (40.0/100), and rug pull risk (40.0/100). The strongest pillar is ecosystem strength, while fundamental quality scores lowest. The alert level is currently WARNING.
Will Maple Finance crash?
ZARQ's crash model estimates a 33% probability of a >50% drawdown for Maple Finance. The Distance-to-Default (NDD) is 2.8, which indicates moderate — some structural pressure. The structural integrity signal (Sig6) is 4.3, and there is 1 structural weakness signal active. Minor structural concerns are noted. These are model-based estimates updated daily, not guarantees of future performance.
Should I invest in Maple Finance?
Maple Finance holds a Ba1 rating from ZARQ. The crash probability is 33% and the Distance-to-Default is 2.8. These metrics suggest notable downside risk. However, ZARQ provides risk data, not investment advice. All crypto investments carry significant risk, including total loss of capital. Consider your risk tolerance, portfolio diversification, and investment horizon. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.
Maple Finance price prediction — what does the risk data say?
ZARQ does not make price predictions for Maple Finance. Instead, we provide quantitative risk metrics: the crash probability is 33% (probability of a >50% drawdown), the Distance-to-Default is 2.8, and the alert level is WARNING. There are 1 structural weakness signals active. These risk signals are updated daily and can help inform — but not replace — your own analysis.
Is Maple Finance a scam?
ZARQ's analysis of Maple Finance shows a Ba1 rating. Minor structural stress detected (1 signal). ZARQ monitors Maple Finance daily across 7 quantitative risk signals including Distance-to-Default, crash probability, and structural integrity. While these signals can flag elevated risk, they cannot definitively determine if an asset is fraudulent. Always verify the project's team, code, and community independently.
What are the pros and cons of Maple Finance?
Based on ZARQ's quantitative analysis, Maple Finance (syrup) has the following strengths: Healthy distance from default (NDD: 2.8); Daily automated risk monitoring by ZARQ. Key risks include: Elevated crash probability (33%); 1 structural weakness signal active; Active risk alert: WARNING. These assessments are based on daily-updated risk models and should be considered alongside your own research and risk tolerance.