Is Stellar Safe? — Trust Score: Baa1

Stellar (xlm) currently holds a Baa1 rating from ZARQ with a trust score of 63.5/100. This is an investment-grade rating at the lower end, indicating moderate risk. The current crash probability is 25%, and its Distance-to-Default stands at 2.8. Minor structural concerns are noted. Over the past 90 days, Stellar has experienced a 31.3% maximum drawdown. The alert level is WATCH. As with all crypto investments, you should conduct your own research and consider your risk tolerance.

ZARQ rates Stellar at Baa1 on a Moody's-style scale (Aaa to C), where Baa3 and above is investment grade. The trust score is 63.5 out of 100, based on five quantitative pillars: ecosystem strength (91.2/100), contagion risk (58.3/100), historical resilience (50.0/100), fundamental quality (63.8/100), and rug pull risk (66.7/100). The strongest pillar is ecosystem strength, while historical resilience scores lowest. The alert level is currently WATCH.

ZARQ's crash model estimates a 25% probability of a >50% drawdown for Stellar. The Distance-to-Default (NDD) is 2.8, which indicates moderate — some structural pressure. The structural integrity signal (Sig6) is 4.7, and there is 1 structural weakness signal active. Minor structural concerns are noted. These are model-based estimates updated daily, not guarantees of future performance.

Stellar holds a Baa1 rating from ZARQ. The crash probability is 25% and the Distance-to-Default is 2.8. These metrics suggest notable downside risk. However, ZARQ provides risk data, not investment advice. All crypto investments carry significant risk, including total loss of capital. Consider your risk tolerance, portfolio diversification, and investment horizon. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.

ZARQ does not make price predictions for Stellar. Instead, we provide quantitative risk metrics: the crash probability is 25% (probability of a >50% drawdown), the Distance-to-Default is 2.8, and the alert level is WATCH. There are 1 structural weakness signals active. These risk signals are updated daily and can help inform — but not replace — your own analysis.

ZARQ's analysis of Stellar shows a Baa1 rating. Minor structural stress detected (1 signal). ZARQ monitors Stellar daily across 7 quantitative risk signals including Distance-to-Default, crash probability, and structural integrity. While these signals can flag elevated risk, they cannot definitively determine if an asset is fraudulent. Always verify the project's team, code, and community independently.

Based on ZARQ's quantitative analysis, Stellar (xlm) has the following strengths: Healthy distance from default (NDD: 2.8); Daily automated risk monitoring by ZARQ. Key risks include: Elevated crash probability (25%); 1 structural weakness signal active. These assessments are based on daily-updated risk models and should be considered alongside your own research and risk tolerance.