Is Golem Safe? — Trust Score: Ba2

Independent risk rating for Golem (glm). Last updated 2026-03-12.

Is Golem safe? ZARQ rates Golem (glm) Ba2 with a trust score of 41.7/100 and a 34% crash probability, based on 7 quantitative risk signals. Distance-to-Default: 1.5. Alert level: DISTRESS. 2 structural weakness signals active — elevated collapse risk. Vitality Score: 28/100 (Grade D), indicating crash resistance — backtested high-Vitality tokens lost 44% less during the 2025-2026 market crash (p < 0.001). Investors searching for Golem safety information should note this rating is updated daily.
Rating Ba2
Score 41.7/100
Crash Prob 34%
Alert DISTRESS
41.7
Trust Score
Composite score 0-100 across 5 pillars
1.5
Distance-to-Default
Elevated risk — approaching distress
34%
Crash Probability
Model-estimated likelihood of >50% drawdown
$0.1312
Price (USD)
28
Vitality Score
Grade D — ecosystem health

Vitality Score Breakdown

The ZARQ Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance across 5 dimensions. Golem scores 28/100 (Grade D), indicating crash resistance — backtested high-Vitality tokens lost 44% less during the 2025–2026 market crash (p < 0.001). Backtested ✓ Methodology

Ecosystem Gravity30
Multi-chain presence, protocol count, DeFi depth
Capital Commitment21
TVL stability, locked capital, market cap rank
Coordination Efficiency10
Audit coverage, category diversity, yield density
Stress Resilience52
Drawdown recovery, NDD stability, crash probability
Organic Momentum18
Rating trend, NDD trend, volume momentum
Data confidence: 100%
Structural Stress Detected
Golem has 2 structural stress signals. This indicates emerging weakness that may worsen. Monitor closely.
MiCA Classification
[CA] Utility Token / Crypto-Asset
Under EU MiCA regulation (2023/1114). Learn more

Risk Signal Breakdown

Pillar 1 — Ecosystem Strength
57.5
Market cap rank, volume stability, activity. Higher is safer.
Pillar 2 — Contagion Risk
53.3
BTC correlation, beta exposure, idiosyncratic risk. Lower correlation = more independent.
Pillar 3 — Historical Resilience
40.0
Max drawdown recovery, annualized volatility, tail risk ratio.
Pillar 4 — Fundamental Quality
25.0
Token age, price consistency, long-term trend strength.
Pillar 5 — Rug Pull Risk
31.7
Anomaly detection, extreme move frequency, dump pattern screening.
Distance-to-Default (NDD)
1.5
Structural distance from default threshold. Below 2.0 = elevated distress.
Structural Signal (Sig6)
4.6
Structural integrity score from the DtD model. Lower values indicate structural weakness.

Compare Similar Tokens (Ba2 Rated)

Pros & Cons of Golem

Strengths
Daily automated risk monitoring by ZARQ
Risks
Elevated crash probability (34%)
Approaching distress threshold (NDD: 1.5)
2 structural weakness signals active

Investment Risk Summary

Golem has an elevated crash probability of 34%, warranting extra caution. Minor structural stress has been detected (2 signals). The Distance-to-Default stands at 1.5, with an alert level of DISTRESS. Rating: Ba2. Vitality Score: 28/100 (Grade D). Backtest results
Disclaimer: This is quantitative risk analysis, not investment advice. Crypto assets are volatile and can lose value rapidly. Never invest more than you can afford to lose. ZARQ provides independent risk data — always do your own research before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Golem safe to invest in?
Golem (glm) currently holds a Ba2 rating from ZARQ with a trust score of 41.7/100. This is a speculative-grade rating, indicating elevated risk. The current crash probability is 34%, and its Distance-to-Default stands at 1.5. Some structural stress signals are present. Over the past 90 days, Golem has experienced a 58.7% maximum drawdown. The alert level is DISTRESS. As with all crypto investments, you should conduct your own research and consider your risk tolerance.
What is Golem's risk rating?
ZARQ rates Golem at Ba2 on a Moody's-style scale (Aaa to C), where Baa3 and above is investment grade. The trust score is 41.7 out of 100, based on five quantitative pillars: ecosystem strength (57.5/100), contagion risk (53.3/100), historical resilience (40.0/100), fundamental quality (25.0/100), and rug pull risk (31.7/100). The strongest pillar is ecosystem strength, while fundamental quality scores lowest. The alert level is currently DISTRESS.
Will Golem crash?
ZARQ's crash model estimates a 34% probability of a >50% drawdown for Golem. The Distance-to-Default (NDD) is 1.5, which indicates elevated risk — approaching distress. The structural integrity signal (Sig6) is 4.6, and there are 2 structural weakness signals active. Some structural stress signals are present. These are model-based estimates updated daily, not guarantees of future performance.
Should I invest in Golem?
Golem holds a Ba2 rating from ZARQ. The crash probability is 34% and the Distance-to-Default is 1.5. These metrics suggest notable downside risk. However, ZARQ provides risk data, not investment advice. All crypto investments carry significant risk, including total loss of capital. Consider your risk tolerance, portfolio diversification, and investment horizon. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.
Golem price prediction — what does the risk data say?
ZARQ does not make price predictions for Golem. Instead, we provide quantitative risk metrics: the crash probability is 34% (probability of a >50% drawdown), the Distance-to-Default is 1.5, and the alert level is DISTRESS. There are 2 structural weakness signals active. These risk signals are updated daily and can help inform — but not replace — your own analysis.
Is Golem a scam?
ZARQ's analysis of Golem shows a Ba2 rating. Minor structural stress detected (2 signals). ZARQ monitors Golem daily across 7 quantitative risk signals including Distance-to-Default, crash probability, and structural integrity. While these signals can flag elevated risk, they cannot definitively determine if an asset is fraudulent. Always verify the project's team, code, and community independently.
What are the pros and cons of Golem?
Based on ZARQ's quantitative analysis, Golem (glm) has the following strengths: Daily automated risk monitoring by ZARQ. Key risks include: Elevated crash probability (34%); Approaching distress threshold (NDD: 1.5); 2 structural weakness signals active. These assessments are based on daily-updated risk models and should be considered alongside your own research and risk tolerance.

Explore More

GolemGolffGoliathGoldn
Vitality RankingsCrash WatchYield RiskToken ScannerMethodologyAll Token Ratings
Disclaimer: ZARQ ratings are quantitative risk assessments, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. Always do your own research.