Independent risk rating for Flying Tulip (ft). Last updated 2026-03-12.
Is Flying Tulip safe? ZARQ rates Flying Tulip (ft) A3 with a trust score of 65.0/100 and a 18% crash probability, based on 7 quantitative risk signals. Distance-to-Default: 3.9. Alert level: WATCH. No structural weaknesses detected. Vitality Score: 65/100 (Grade B), indicating crash resistance — backtested high-Vitality tokens lost 44% less during the 2025-2026 market crash (p < 0.001). Investors searching for Flying Tulip safety information should note this rating is updated daily.
Vitality Score Breakdown
The ZARQ Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance across 5 dimensions. Flying Tulip scores 65/100 (Grade B), indicating crash resistance — backtested high-Vitality tokens lost 44% less during the 2025–2026 market crash (p < 0.001). Backtested ✓ Methodology
Ecosystem Gravity95
Multi-chain presence, protocol count, DeFi depth
Capital Commitment70
TVL stability, locked capital, market cap rank
Coordination Efficiency50
Audit coverage, category diversity, yield density
Stress Resilience53
Drawdown recovery, NDD stability, crash probability
Organic Momentum55
Rating trend, NDD trend, volume momentum
Data confidence: 100%
Pillar 1 — Ecosystem Strength
70.0
Market cap rank, volume stability, activity. Higher is safer.
Pillar 2 — Contagion Risk
66.7
BTC correlation, beta exposure, idiosyncratic risk. Lower correlation = more independent.
Pillar 3 — Historical Resilience
92.5
Max drawdown recovery, annualized volatility, tail risk ratio.
Pillar 4 — Fundamental Quality
50.0
Token age, price consistency, long-term trend strength.
Pillar 5 — Rug Pull Risk
31.7
Anomaly detection, extreme move frequency, dump pattern screening.
Distance-to-Default (NDD)
3.9
Structural distance from default threshold. Below 2.0 = elevated distress.
Structural Signal (Sig6)
4.5
Structural integrity score from the DtD model. Lower values indicate structural weakness.
Flying Tulip carries moderate crash risk at 18%, typical for mid-cap crypto assets. No structural weaknesses have been detected. The Distance-to-Default stands at 3.9, with an alert level of WATCH. Rating: A3. This token scored in the top quintile for crash resistance based on backtested Vitality Score (65, Grade B).
Backtest resultsDisclaimer: This is quantitative risk analysis, not investment advice. Crypto assets are volatile and can lose value rapidly. Never invest more than you can afford to lose. ZARQ provides independent risk data — always do your own research before making investment decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Flying Tulip safe to invest in?
Flying Tulip (ft) currently holds a A3 rating from ZARQ with a trust score of 65.0/100. This is a high-quality rating, indicating low to moderate risk. The current crash probability is 18%, and its Distance-to-Default stands at 3.9. No structural weaknesses detected. The alert level is WATCH. As with all crypto investments, you should conduct your own research and consider your risk tolerance.
What is Flying Tulip's risk rating?
ZARQ rates Flying Tulip at A3 on a Moody's-style scale (Aaa to C), where Baa3 and above is investment grade. The trust score is 65.0 out of 100, based on five quantitative pillars: ecosystem strength (70.0/100), contagion risk (66.7/100), historical resilience (92.5/100), fundamental quality (50.0/100), and rug pull risk (31.7/100). The strongest pillar is historical resilience, while rug pull risk scores lowest. The alert level is currently WATCH.
Will Flying Tulip crash?
ZARQ's crash model estimates a 18% probability of a >50% drawdown for Flying Tulip. The Distance-to-Default (NDD) is 3.9, which indicates healthy — comfortable distance from default. The structural integrity signal (Sig6) is 4.5, and there are 0 structural weakness signals active. No structural weaknesses detected. These are model-based estimates updated daily, not guarantees of future performance.
Should I invest in Flying Tulip?
Flying Tulip holds a A3 rating from ZARQ. The crash probability is 18% and the Distance-to-Default is 3.9. These metrics suggest notable downside risk. However, ZARQ provides risk data, not investment advice. All crypto investments carry significant risk, including total loss of capital. Consider your risk tolerance, portfolio diversification, and investment horizon. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.
Flying Tulip price prediction — what does the risk data say?
ZARQ does not make price predictions for Flying Tulip. Instead, we provide quantitative risk metrics: the crash probability is 18% (probability of a >50% drawdown), the Distance-to-Default is 3.9, and the alert level is WATCH. No structural weakness signals are active. These risk signals are updated daily and can help inform — but not replace — your own analysis.
Is Flying Tulip a scam?
ZARQ's analysis of Flying Tulip shows a A3 rating. No structural collapse signals detected. ZARQ monitors Flying Tulip daily across 7 quantitative risk signals including Distance-to-Default, crash probability, and structural integrity. While these signals can flag elevated risk, they cannot definitively determine if an asset is fraudulent. Always verify the project's team, code, and community independently.
What are the pros and cons of Flying Tulip?
Based on ZARQ's quantitative analysis, Flying Tulip (ft) has the following strengths: Moderate crash probability (18%); Strong distance from default (NDD: 3.9); No structural collapse signals detected. Key risks include: Crypto assets carry inherent volatility risk. These assessments are based on daily-updated risk models and should be considered alongside your own research and risk tolerance.