Independent risk rating for Ethereum Name Service (ens). Last updated 2026-03-31.
Ethereum Name Service (ens) has a ZARQ Safety Rating of Ba1 (45.6/100) and a Vitality Score of D (36/100). Risk level: WATCH. Crash probability: 12%. Distance-to-Default: 3.1. Last updated: 2026-03-31. Based on 7 quantitative pillars including NDD, crash probability, TVL, and DeFi yield analysis. 1 structural weakness signal active — elevated collapse risk.
RatingBa1
Score45.6/100
Crash Prob12%
AlertWATCH
45.6
Trust Score
Composite score 0-100 across 5 pillars
3.1
Distance-to-Default
Healthy — comfortable distance from default
12%
Crash Probability
Model-estimated likelihood of >50% drawdown
$6.33
Price (USD)
36
Vitality Score
Grade D — ecosystem health
This token scores 45.6/100.
What's yours?
Free security check, 2 seconds, nothing stored.
Vitality Score Breakdown
The ZARQ Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance across 5 dimensions. Ethereum Name Service scores 36/100 (Grade D), indicating crash resistance — backtested high-Vitality tokens lost 44% less during the 2025–2026 market crash (p < 0.001). Backtested ✓Methodology
Ecosystem Gravity50
Multi-chain presence, protocol count, DeFi depth
Capital Commitment17
TVL stability, locked capital, market cap rank
Coordination Efficiency10
Audit coverage, category diversity, yield density
Stress Resilience49
Drawdown recovery, NDD stability, crash probability
Ethereum Name Service carries moderate crash risk at 12%, typical for mid-cap crypto assets. Minor structural stress has been detected (1 signal). The Distance-to-Default stands at 3.1, with an alert level of WATCH. Rating: Ba1. Vitality Score: 36/100 (Grade D). Backtest results
Disclaimer: This is quantitative risk analysis, not investment advice. Crypto assets are volatile and can lose value rapidly. Never invest more than you can afford to lose. ZARQ provides independent risk data — always do your own research before making investment decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Ethereum Name Service safe to invest in?
Ethereum Name Service (ens) currently holds a Ba1 rating from ZARQ with a trust score of 45.6/100. This is a speculative-grade rating, indicating elevated risk. The current crash probability is 12%, and its Distance-to-Default stands at 3.1. Minor structural concerns are noted. Over the past 90 days, Ethereum Name Service has experienced a 43.7% maximum drawdown. The alert level is WATCH. As with all crypto investments, you should conduct your own research and consider your risk tolerance.
What is Ethereum Name Service's risk rating?
ZARQ rates Ethereum Name Service at Ba1 on a Moody's-style scale (Aaa to C), where Baa3 and above is investment grade. The trust score is 45.6 out of 100, based on five quantitative pillars: ecosystem strength (57.5/100), contagion risk (60.0/100), historical resilience (40.0/100), fundamental quality (36.2/100), and rug pull risk (31.7/100). The strongest pillar is contagion risk, while rug pull risk scores lowest. The alert level is currently WATCH.
Will Ethereum Name Service crash?
ZARQ's crash model estimates a 12% probability of a >50% drawdown for Ethereum Name Service. The Distance-to-Default (NDD) is 3.1, which indicates healthy — comfortable distance from default. The structural integrity signal (Sig6) is 4.6, and there is 1 structural weakness signal active. Minor structural concerns are noted. These are model-based estimates updated daily, not guarantees of future performance.
Should I invest in Ethereum Name Service?
Ethereum Name Service holds a Ba1 rating from ZARQ. The crash probability is 12% and the Distance-to-Default is 3.1. These metrics suggest relatively contained downside risk. However, ZARQ provides risk data, not investment advice. All crypto investments carry significant risk, including total loss of capital. Consider your risk tolerance, portfolio diversification, and investment horizon. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.
Ethereum Name Service price prediction — what does the risk data say?
ZARQ does not make price predictions for Ethereum Name Service. Instead, we provide quantitative risk metrics: the crash probability is 12% (probability of a >50% drawdown), the Distance-to-Default is 3.1, and the alert level is WATCH. There are 1 structural weakness signals active. These risk signals are updated daily and can help inform — but not replace — your own analysis.
Is Ethereum Name Service a scam?
ZARQ's analysis of Ethereum Name Service shows a Ba1 rating. Minor structural stress detected (1 signal). ZARQ monitors Ethereum Name Service daily across 7 quantitative risk signals including Distance-to-Default, crash probability, and structural integrity. While these signals can flag elevated risk, they cannot definitively determine if an asset is fraudulent. Always verify the project's team, code, and community independently.
What are the pros and cons of Ethereum Name Service?
Based on ZARQ's quantitative analysis, Ethereum Name Service (ens) has the following strengths: Moderate crash probability (12%); Healthy distance from default (NDD: 3.1). Key risks include: 1 structural weakness signal active; Crypto assets carry inherent volatility risk. These assessments are based on daily-updated risk models and should be considered alongside your own research and risk tolerance.
Disclaimer: ZARQ ratings are quantitative risk assessments, not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. Always do your own research.