Is Fraud Extractor Safe? — Trust Score: 53.7/100
According to Nerq's independent analysis of @rosen-bridge/fraud-extractor, this uncategorized has a trust score of 53.7 out of 100, earning a D grade. With 0 stars on npm_full, it is below the recommended threshold of 70. Compliance: 82/100 across 52 jurisdictions. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-19. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Fraud Extractor safe?
CAUTION — Fraud Extractor has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.7/100 (D). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Trust Assessment
Caution — @rosen-bridge/fraud-extractor has below-average trust signals. There may be concerns around maintenance frequency, security practices, or ecosystem adoption. Proceed with care and conduct additional due diligence.
Trust Signal Breakdown
Details
| Author | zargarzadehm |
| Category | uncategorized |
| Stars | 0 |
| Source | https://www.npmjs.com/package/@rosen-bridge/fraud-extractor |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 82/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Community Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to review @rosen-bridge/fraud-extractor.
What Is Fraud Extractor?
Fraud Extractor is a AI tool in the uncategorized category. fraud information extractor for watcher faulty reports
As of March 2026, Fraud Extractor is available on npm_full, making it an emerging tool in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.
How Nerq Assesses Fraud Extractor's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Fraud Extractor performs in each:
- Compliance (82/100): Fraud Extractor is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
The overall Trust Score of 53.7/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Fraud Extractor?
Fraud Extractor is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Fraud Extractor is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Fraud Extractor's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Fraud Extractor's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Fraud Extractor requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Fraud Extractor in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@rosen-bridge/fraud-extractor - Review the license — Confirm that Fraud Extractor's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Fraud Extractor
When evaluating whether Fraud Extractor is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Fraud Extractor processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Fraud Extractor's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Fraud Extractor. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Fraud Extractor connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Fraud Extractor's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Fraud Extractor in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Fraud Extractor Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Fraud Extractor while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Fraud Extractor is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Fraud Extractor and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Fraud Extractor only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Fraud Extractor's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Fraud Extractor is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Fraud Extractor?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Fraud Extractor in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Fraud Extractor's trust score of 53.7/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Fraud Extractor Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Fraud Extractor's score of 53.7/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Fraud Extractor in line with the typical uncategorized tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Fraud Extractor and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Fraud Extractor's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Fraud Extractor's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@rosen-bridge/fraud-extractor&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Fraud Extractor are strengthening or weakening over time.
Key Takeaways
- Fraud Extractor has a Trust Score of 53.7/100 (D) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Fraud Extractor shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among uncategorized tools, Fraud Extractor scores near the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Add This Badge to YOUR Project
Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/safe/rosen-bridge)
Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.
pip install nerq && nerq scan
Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.
Related Safety Checks
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.