Is Openclaw Mcp Servers Safe? — Trust Score: 53.0/100

According to Nerq's independent analysis of openclaw-mcp-servers, this uncategorized has a trust score of 53.0 out of 100, earning a D grade. With 0 stars on mcp, it is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security score: 0/100. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-19. Machine-readable data (JSON).

openclaw-mcp-servers has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (D). Not yet Nerq Verified (requires 70+). Its strongest signal is security (0/100). Last verified: 2026-03-19.

Is Openclaw Mcp Servers safe?

CAUTION — Openclaw Mcp Servers has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (D). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

53.0

out of 100

D uncategorized mcp

Trust Assessment

Caution — openclaw-mcp-servers has below-average trust signals. There may be concerns around maintenance frequency, security practices, or ecosystem adoption. Proceed with care and conduct additional due diligence.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security

Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.

Maintenance

Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.

Documentation

README quality, API docs, usage examples.

Popularity

Community adoption. 0 stars on mcp.

Details

Author	yedanyagamiai-cmd
Category	uncategorized
Stars	0
Source	https://github.com/yedanyagamiai-cmd/openclaw-mcp-servers
Protocols	mcp

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review openclaw-mcp-servers.

What Is Openclaw Mcp Servers?

Openclaw Mcp Servers is a AI tool in the uncategorized category. OpenClaw Intelligence - 12 MCP Servers for AI Agents | 62 Tools | AI Market Intel, Content Publishing, Developer Utilities | Free + Pro | Cloudflare Workers

As of March 2026, Openclaw Mcp Servers is available on mcp, making it an emerging tool in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.

How Nerq Assesses Openclaw Mcp Servers's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Openclaw Mcp Servers performs in each:

Security (0/100): Openclaw Mcp Servers's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
Maintenance (0/100): Openclaw Mcp Servers is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.

The overall Trust Score of 53.0/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Openclaw Mcp Servers?

Openclaw Mcp Servers is designed for:

Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain

Risk guidance: Openclaw Mcp Servers is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Openclaw Mcp Servers's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:

Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Openclaw Mcp Servers's dependency tree.
Review permissions — Understand what access Openclaw Mcp Servers requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
Test in isolation — Run Openclaw Mcp Servers in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-mcp-servers
Review the license — Confirm that Openclaw Mcp Servers's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Openclaw Mcp Servers

When evaluating whether Openclaw Mcp Servers is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Openclaw Mcp Servers processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Openclaw Mcp Servers's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Openclaw Mcp Servers. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Openclaw Mcp Servers connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Openclaw Mcp Servers's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclaw Mcp Servers in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Openclaw Mcp Servers Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclaw Mcp Servers while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Openclaw Mcp Servers is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Openclaw Mcp Servers and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Openclaw Mcp Servers only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Openclaw Mcp Servers's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclaw Mcp Servers is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Openclaw Mcp Servers?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Openclaw Mcp Servers in these scenarios:

Production environments handling sensitive customer data
Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact

For each scenario, evaluate whether Openclaw Mcp Servers's trust score of 53.0/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Openclaw Mcp Servers Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Openclaw Mcp Servers's score of 53.0/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Openclaw Mcp Servers in line with the typical uncategorized tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Mcp Servers and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Openclaw Mcp Servers's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclaw Mcp Servers's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-mcp-servers&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclaw Mcp Servers are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

Openclaw Mcp Servers has a Trust Score of 53.0/100 (D) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
Openclaw Mcp Servers shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
Among uncategorized tools, Openclaw Mcp Servers scores near the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is openclaw-mcp-servers safe to use?

openclaw-mcp-servers has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100, earning a D grade. Caution — openclaw-mcp-servers has below-average trust signals. There may be concerns around maintenance frequency, security practices, or ecosystem adoption. Proceed with care and conduct additional due diligence. Its strongest signal is security (0/100). It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Always review the full KYA report before using any AI agent in production.

What is openclaw-mcp-servers's trust score?

Nerq assigns openclaw-mcp-servers a trust score of 53.0 out of 100, with a grade of D. This score is computed from multiple dimensions including security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (0 stars). Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.

Are there safer alternatives to openclaw-mcp-servers?

In the uncategorized category, no higher-rated alternatives were found — this is among the top-rated agents. openclaw-mcp-servers scores 53.0/100. When choosing between agents, consider your specific requirements for security (N/A), maintenance activity (N/A), and documentation (N/A). Use Nerq's comparison tools or the KYA endpoint for detailed side-by-side analysis.

How often is Openclaw Mcp Servers's safety score updated?

Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Mcp Servers and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. The system ingests signals from 13+ independent sources including GitHub, NVD (National Vulnerability Database), OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and major package registries (npm, PyPI). When a new CVE is disclosed, a dependency is updated, or commit activity changes, the score adjusts automatically. For the most current score, query the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-mcp-servers. The current assessment (53.0/100, D) was last verified on 2026-03-19.

Can I use Openclaw Mcp Servers in a regulated environment?

Openclaw Mcp Servers has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, which means additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments. Nerq assesses regulatory alignment across 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, GDPR, CCPA, and sector-specific frameworks. For organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), we recommend combining the Nerq Trust Score with your internal security review process, vendor risk assessment, and legal compliance check before deployment.

Add This Badge to YOUR Project

Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/openclaw-mcp-servers)](https://nerq.ai/safe/openclaw-mcp-servers)

Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.

Scan your project

pip install nerq && nerq scan

Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.

Integrate trust checks

curl nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-mcp-servers

API docs →

Improve this score

See recommendations →

Verify any agent

Browse uncategorized

All agents · MCP servers · Compare · Gateway

Related Safety Checks

Is Cursor safe? Is ChatGPT safe? Is Claude safe? Is Windsurf safe? Is Bolt safe? Is Cline safe? Is GitHub Copilot safe? Is Gemini safe? Is Ollama safe? Is LangChain safe? Is OpenAI safe? Is n8n safe? Is ComfyUI safe? Is CrewAI safe? Is AutoGPT safe? Is Devin safe? Is Continue safe? Is LlamaIndex safe? Is Hugging Face safe? Is Stable Diffusion safe?

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.