Is n8n Safe? — Trust Score: 79.7/100

According to Nerq's independent analysis of n8n-io/n8n, this infrastructure has a trust score of 79.7 out of 100, earning a B+ grade. With 177,288 stars on github, it is recommended for production use. Security score: 1/100. Compliance: 100/100 across 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act classification: minimal. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-18. Machine-readable data (JSON).

n8n-io/n8n has a Nerq Trust Score of 79.7/100 (B+). Recommended — meets Nerq Verified threshold. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Last verified: 2026-03-18.

Is n8n safe?

YES — n8n has a Nerq Trust Score of 79.7/100 (B+). It meets Nerq's trust threshold with strong signals across security, maintenance, and community adoption. Recommended for production use — review the full report below for specific considerations.

79.7
out of 100
B+ infrastructure github verified

Trust Assessment

Trusted — n8n-io/n8n demonstrates strong trust signals. It meets the threshold for Nerq Verified status, indicating solid security practices, active maintenance, and a healthy ecosystem presence.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
1
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
1
Community adoption. 177,288 stars on github.

Details

Authorn8n-io
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars177,288
Sourcehttps://github.com/n8n-io/n8n
Protocolsmcp

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Popular Alternatives in infrastructure

langflow-ai/langflow
87.6/100 · A
github
langgenius/dify
80.3/100 · A
github
open-webui/open-webui
74.8/100 · B
github
supabase/supabase
71.8/100 · B
github
google-gemini/gemini-cli
71.8/100 · B
github

Deep Analysis: n8n-io/n8n

Executive Summary

n8n-io/n8n is a infrastructure tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 79.7/100 (B). 4 known CVEs (3 CRITICAL). 177,288 GitHub stars. Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.

Security: 4 Known CVEs

CVE IDSeverityDescriptionDiscovered
CVE-2026-25631 MEDIUM Domain allowlist bypass enables credential exfiltration 2026-03-12
CVE-2026-25115 CRITICAL n8n has a Python sandbox escape 2026-03-12
CVE-2026-27494 CRITICAL Python Code Node Sandbox Escape 2026-03-12
CVE-2025-65964 CRITICAL Remote Code Execution via Git Node Custom Pre-Commit Hook 2026-03-12

Maintenance Health

  • GitHub stars: 177,288
  • Activity score: 1/100

Ecosystem Position

  • Compatible frameworks: groq, langchain, mcp-sdk, openai

Cost Analysis

  • Pricing: usage_based — Free
  • Free tier: Unlimited (self-hosted)
  • Pricing: usage_based — $24.00/mo
  • Pricing: usage_based — $60.00/mo
  • Cost per code_review: $0.0300
  • Cost per code_generation: $0.0450
  • Cost per chat_response: $0.0075
  • Cost per document_analysis: $0.0450
  • Cost per data_extraction: $0.0225

Trust Score Breakdown

Security1/100
Compliance100/100
Maintenance1/100
Documentation1/100
Community1/100

Strongest: Compliance (100/100). Weakest: Documentation (1/100).

How to Improve This Score

Improve security practices
Add security policy, fix known vulnerabilities, enable dependency scanning.
Estimated impact: +5-15 points
Increase maintenance activity
Respond to issues, merge PRs, publish regular releases.
Estimated impact: +5-10 points
Improve documentation
Add API docs, usage examples, contribution guidelines.
Estimated impact: +5-10 points

Frequently Asked Questions

Is n8n safe to use in production?

Yes. n8n has a Nerq Trust Score of 79.7/100 (B). This meets the Nerq Verified threshold, but review the detailed analysis before production use.

Does n8n have any known vulnerabilities?

As of March 2026, n8n has no known CVEs in the Nerq database.

What license does n8n use?

License information is not yet available in the Nerq database.

How does n8n compare to alternatives?

In the infrastructure category, n8n scores 79.7/100. Use the Nerq comparison API to compare directly: curl nerq.ai/v1/compare/n8n/vs/[alternative]

How often is n8n updated?

Check the maintenance health section above for the latest activity data. Nerq tracks commit frequency, release cadence, and issue response times.

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review n8n-io/n8n.

What Is n8n?

n8n is a AI tool in the infrastructure category. Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.

As of March 2026, n8n has 177,288 stars on github, making it one of the most popular tools in its category in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.

How Nerq Assesses n8n's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how n8n performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 79.7/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.

Who Should Use n8n?

n8n is designed for:

Risk guidance: n8n meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for security advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.

How to Verify n8n's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in n8n's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access n8n requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run n8n in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=n8n-io/n8n
  6. Review the license — Confirm that n8n's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with n8n

When evaluating whether n8n is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how n8n processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check n8n's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to n8n. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If n8n connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that n8n's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using n8n in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

n8n and the EU AI Act

n8n is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.

Best Practices for Using n8n Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from n8n while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how n8n is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure n8n and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant n8n only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to n8n's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how n8n is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid n8n?

Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding n8n in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether n8n's trust score of 79.7/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.

How n8n Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among infrastructure tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. n8n's score of 79.7/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.

This places n8n in the top tier of infrastructure tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature security practices, consistent release cadence, and broad community adoption.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors n8n and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, n8n's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track n8n's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=n8n-io/n8n&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of n8n are strengthening or weakening over time.

n8n vs Alternatives

In the infrastructure category, n8n scores 79.7/100. It ranks among the top tools in its category. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is n8n-io/n8n safe to use?
n8n-io/n8n has a Nerq Trust Score of 79.7/100, earning a B+ grade. Trusted — n8n-io/n8n demonstrates strong trust signals. It meets the threshold for Nerq Verified status, indicating solid security practices, active maintenance, and a healthy ecosystem presence. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meaning it meets the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before using any AI agent in production.
What is n8n-io/n8n's trust score?
Nerq assigns n8n-io/n8n a trust score of 79.7 out of 100, with a grade of B+. This score is computed from multiple dimensions including security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (177,288 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there safer alternatives to n8n-io/n8n?
In the infrastructure category, higher-rated alternatives include langflow-ai/langflow, langgenius/dify, open-webui/open-webui (scores: 88, 80, 75). n8n-io/n8n scores 79.7/100. When choosing between agents, consider your specific requirements for security (1), maintenance activity (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's comparison tools or the KYA endpoint for detailed side-by-side analysis.
How often is n8n's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors n8n and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. The system ingests signals from 13+ independent sources including GitHub, NVD (National Vulnerability Database), OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and major package registries (npm, PyPI). When a new CVE is disclosed, a dependency is updated, or commit activity changes, the score adjusts automatically. For the most current score, query the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=n8n-io/n8n. The current assessment (79.7/100, B+) was last verified on 2026-03-18.
Can I use n8n in a regulated environment?
Yes — n8n meets the Nerq Verified threshold (70+), indicating it has passed automated trust checks across security, compliance, and maintenance dimensions. Nerq assesses compliance across 52 jurisdictions. n8n has a compliance score of 100/100. Under the EU AI Act, n8n is classified as minimal risk. For organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), we recommend combining the Nerq Trust Score with your internal security review process, vendor risk assessment, and legal compliance check before deployment.

Add This Badge to YOUR Project

Nerq Trust Score for n8n-io/n8n

Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/n8n-io/n8n)](https://nerq.ai/safe/n8n-io-n8n)

Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.

Scan your project
pip install nerq && nerq scan

Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.

Integrate trust checks
curl nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=n8n-io-n8n
API docs →
Improve this score
See recommendations →
Verify any agent
Browse infrastructure
All agents · MCP servers · Compare · Gateway

Related Safety Checks

Is Cursor safe? Is ChatGPT safe? Is Claude safe? Is Windsurf safe? Is Bolt safe? Is Cline safe? Is GitHub Copilot safe? Is Gemini safe? Is Ollama safe? Is LangChain safe? Is OpenAI safe? Is n8n safe? Is ComfyUI safe? Is CrewAI safe? Is AutoGPT safe? Is Devin safe? Is Continue safe? Is LlamaIndex safe? Is Hugging Face safe? Is Stable Diffusion safe?

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Also explore

Nerq Trust Protocol AI Compliance Hub Know Your Agent Crypto Vitality Rankings Crash Watch: Live Alerts Real-Time Token Scanner