Is Limebot Os Safe? — Trust Score: 66.6/100

66.6/100
Trust Score (C)
⚠️ Use Caution
Below Nerq Verified threshold — review signals before deploying

Why This Score

According to Nerq's independent analysis of LimeBot-OS, this ai_assistant has a trust score of 66.6 out of 100, earning a C grade. With 14 stars on github, it is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security score: 0/100. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-19. Machine-readable data (JSON).

LimeBot-OS has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.6/100 (C). Not yet Nerq Verified (requires 70+). Its strongest signal is maintenance (1/100). Last verified: 2026-03-19.

Is Limebot Os safe?

CAUTION — Limebot Os has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.6/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

66.6
out of 100
C ai_assistant github

Trust Assessment

Moderate — LimeBot-OS shows mixed trust signals. Some areas are strong while others could be improved. We recommend reviewing the full KYA (Know Your Agent) report before integrating it into production workflows.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 14 stars on github.

Details

AuthorEthereal-Lemons
Categoryai_assistant
Stars14
Sourcehttps://github.com/Ethereal-Lemons/LimeBot-OS
Frameworksopenai · anthropic · mcp
Protocolsmcp · rest · websocket

Popular Alternatives in ai_assistant

Mastra Docs
51.9/100 · D
pulsemcp
btriapitsyn/openchamber
89.1/100 · A
github
openakita/openakita
81.8/100 · A
github
mistralai/Mixtral-8x22B-Instruct-v0.1
60.0/100 · C
huggingface_model
Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
63.0/100 · C
huggingface_model

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review LimeBot-OS.

What Is Limebot Os?

Limebot Os is a AI tool in the ai_assistant category. LimeBot is a self-hosted, agentic AI assistant with memory and a real-time web dashboard.

As of March 2026, Limebot Os is available on github, making it an emerging tool in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.

How Nerq Assesses Limebot Os's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Limebot Os performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 66.6/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Limebot Os?

Limebot Os is designed for:

Risk guidance: Limebot Os is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Limebot Os's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Limebot Os's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Limebot Os requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Limebot Os in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=LimeBot-OS
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Limebot Os's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Limebot Os

When evaluating whether Limebot Os is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Limebot Os processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Limebot Os's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Limebot Os. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Limebot Os connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Limebot Os's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Limebot Os in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Limebot Os Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Limebot Os while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Limebot Os is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Limebot Os and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Limebot Os only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Limebot Os's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Limebot Os is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Limebot Os?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Limebot Os in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Limebot Os's trust score of 66.6/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Limebot Os Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among ai_assistant tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Limebot Os's score of 66.6/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Limebot Os favorably among ai_assistant tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Limebot Os and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Limebot Os's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Limebot Os's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=LimeBot-OS&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Limebot Os are strengthening or weakening over time.

Limebot Os vs Alternatives

In the ai_assistant category, Limebot Os scores 66.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Safer Alternatives

Higher-rated ai_assistant agents you may want to consider:

btriapitsyn/openchamber
89.1/100 · A
github
openakita/openakita
81.8/100 · A
github

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LimeBot-OS safe to use?
LimeBot-OS has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.6/100, earning a C grade. Moderate — LimeBot-OS shows mixed trust signals. Some areas are strong while others could be improved. We recommend reviewing the full KYA (Know Your Agent) report before integrating it into production workflows. Its strongest signal is maintenance (1/100). It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Always review the full KYA report before using any AI agent in production.
What is LimeBot-OS's trust score?
Nerq assigns LimeBot-OS a trust score of 66.6 out of 100, with a grade of C. This score is computed from multiple dimensions including security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (14 stars). Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there safer alternatives to LimeBot-OS?
In the ai_assistant category, higher-rated alternatives include Mastra Docs, btriapitsyn/openchamber, openakita/openakita (scores: 52, 89, 82). LimeBot-OS scores 66.6/100. When choosing between agents, consider your specific requirements for security (N/A), maintenance activity (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's comparison tools or the KYA endpoint for detailed side-by-side analysis.
How often is Limebot Os's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Limebot Os and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. The system ingests signals from 13+ independent sources including GitHub, NVD (National Vulnerability Database), OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and major package registries (npm, PyPI). When a new CVE is disclosed, a dependency is updated, or commit activity changes, the score adjusts automatically. For the most current score, query the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=LimeBot-OS. The current assessment (66.6/100, C) was last verified on 2026-03-19.
Can I use Limebot Os in a regulated environment?
Limebot Os has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, which means additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments. Nerq assesses regulatory alignment across 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, GDPR, CCPA, and sector-specific frameworks. For organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), we recommend combining the Nerq Trust Score with your internal security review process, vendor risk assessment, and legal compliance check before deployment.

Add This Badge to YOUR Project

Nerq Trust Score for LimeBot-OS

Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/LimeBot-OS)](https://nerq.ai/safe/limebot-os)

Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.

Scan your project
pip install nerq && nerq scan

Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.

Integrate trust checks
curl nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=limebot-os
API docs →
Improve this score
See recommendations →
Verify any agent
Browse ai_assistant
All agents · MCP servers · Compare · Gateway

Related Safety Checks

Is Cursor safe? Is ChatGPT safe? Is Claude safe? Is Windsurf safe? Is Bolt safe? Is Cline safe? Is GitHub Copilot safe? Is Gemini safe? Is Ollama safe? Is LangChain safe? Is OpenAI safe? Is n8n safe? Is ComfyUI safe? Is CrewAI safe? Is AutoGPT safe? Is Devin safe? Is Continue safe? Is LlamaIndex safe? Is Hugging Face safe? Is Stable Diffusion safe?

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Also explore

Nerq Trust Protocol AI Compliance Hub Know Your Agent Crypto Vitality Rankings Crash Watch: Live Alerts Real-Time Token Scanner