Is Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition Safe? — Trust Score: 66.6/100

According to Nerq's independent analysis of Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition, this design has a trust score of 66.6 out of 100, earning a C grade. With 48 stars on github, it is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security score: 0/100. Compliance: 100/100 across 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act classification: minimal. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-18. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.6/100 (C). Not yet Nerq Verified (requires 70+). Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Last verified: 2026-03-18.

Is Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition safe?

CAUTION — Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.6/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

66.6
out of 100
C design github

Trust Assessment

Moderate — Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition shows mixed trust signals. Some areas are strong while others could be improved. We recommend reviewing the full KYA (Know Your Agent) report before integrating it into production workflows.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
0
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 48 stars on github.

Details

AuthorUnknown
Categorydesign
Stars48
Sourcehttps://github.com/Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Popular Alternatives in design

invoke-ai/InvokeAI
73.8/100 · B
github
onlook-dev/onlook
73.8/100 · B
github
Figma Context
51.9/100 · D
pulsemcp
Anionex/banana-slides
73.8/100 · B
github
creativetimofficial/ui
88.3/100 · A
github

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition.

What Is Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition?

Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is a AI tool in the design category. Automates manufacturing feature recognition in CAD designs using vision-language models.

As of March 2026, Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is available on github, making it an emerging tool in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.

How Nerq Assesses Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 66.6/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition?

Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is designed for:

Risk guidance: Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition

When evaluating whether Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition and the EU AI Act

Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.

Best Practices for Using Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's trust score of 66.6/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among design tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's score of 66.6/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition favorably among design tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition are strengthening or weakening over time.

Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition vs Alternatives

In the design category, Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition scores 66.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition safe to use?
Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.6/100, earning a C grade. Moderate — Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition shows mixed trust signals. Some areas are strong while others could be improved. We recommend reviewing the full KYA (Know Your Agent) report before integrating it into production workflows. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Always review the full KYA report before using any AI agent in production.
What is Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition's trust score?
Nerq assigns Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition a trust score of 66.6 out of 100, with a grade of C. This score is computed from multiple dimensions including security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (48 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there safer alternatives to Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition?
In the design category, higher-rated alternatives include invoke-ai/InvokeAI, onlook-dev/onlook, Figma Context (scores: 74, 74, 52). Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition scores 66.6/100. When choosing between agents, consider your specific requirements for security (N/A), maintenance activity (1), and documentation (N/A). Use Nerq's comparison tools or the KYA endpoint for detailed side-by-side analysis.
How often is Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. The system ingests signals from 13+ independent sources including GitHub, NVD (National Vulnerability Database), OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and major package registries (npm, PyPI). When a new CVE is disclosed, a dependency is updated, or commit activity changes, the score adjusts automatically. For the most current score, query the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition. The current assessment (66.6/100, C) was last verified on 2026-03-18.
Can I use Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition in a regulated environment?
Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, which means additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments. Nerq assesses compliance across 52 jurisdictions. Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition has a compliance score of 100/100. Under the EU AI Act, Vlm Cadfeaturerecognition is classified as minimal risk. For organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), we recommend combining the Nerq Trust Score with your internal security review process, vendor risk assessment, and legal compliance check before deployment.

Add This Badge to YOUR Project

Nerq Trust Score for Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition

Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/Davidlequnchen/VLM-CADFeatureRecognition)](https://nerq.ai/safe/davidlequnchen-vlm-cadfeaturerecognition)

Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.

Scan your project
pip install nerq && nerq scan

Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.

Integrate trust checks
curl nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=davidlequnchen-vlm-cadfeaturerecognition
API docs →
Improve this score
See recommendations →
Verify any agent
Browse design
All agents · MCP servers · Compare · Gateway

Related Safety Checks

Is Cursor safe? Is ChatGPT safe? Is Claude safe? Is Windsurf safe? Is Bolt safe? Is Cline safe? Is GitHub Copilot safe? Is Gemini safe? Is Ollama safe? Is LangChain safe? Is OpenAI safe? Is n8n safe? Is ComfyUI safe? Is CrewAI safe? Is AutoGPT safe? Is Devin safe? Is Continue safe? Is LlamaIndex safe? Is Hugging Face safe? Is Stable Diffusion safe?

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Also explore

Nerq Trust Protocol AI Compliance Hub Know Your Agent Crypto Vitality Rankings Crash Watch: Live Alerts Real-Time Token Scanner