Trust Assessment
Trusted — claw demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption.
Is claw MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 79.4/100
Independent trust assessment for the claw MCP server. Category: security. Source: github.
claw is a security MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 79.4/100 (grade: B). Its strongest signal is compliance (94/100). It lists 4 capabilities. It is Nerq Verified (trust score >= 70). Assessment: Trusted — strong signals.
79.4
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
B
MCP Server
security
verified
Trust Signal Breakdown
Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
94
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 0 stars on github.
Capabilities
- OPA policy enforcement
- PII scanning
- context masking
- comprehensive audit trails
Details
| Author | Leeladitya |
| Category | security |
| Stars | 0 |
| Source | https://github.com/Leeladitya/claw |
| Protocol | MCP (Model Context Protocol) |
| Popularity | #253 of 22026 MCP servers |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
Higher-Rated MCP Servers in security
Frequently Asked Questions
Is claw MCP server safe to use?
claw has a Nerq Trust Score of 79.4/100, earning a B grade. Trusted — claw demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption. Its strongest signal is compliance (94/100). It is Nerq Verified, meeting the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is claw's trust score?
Nerq assigns claw a trust score of 79.4 out of 100, with a grade of B. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (0 stars). Compliance score: 94/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to claw?
In the security category, higher-rated MCP servers include CursorTouch/Windows-MCP, cyproxio/mcp-for-security, export-assist-mcp (scores: 89, 88, 87). claw scores 79.4/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.
Badge Embed
Add this trust badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/mcp/claw)
Actions
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.