Is CursorTouch/Windows-MCP MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 89.0/100

Independent trust assessment for the CursorTouch/Windows-MCP MCP server. Category: security. Source: github.

CursorTouch/Windows-MCP is a security MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 89.0/100 (grade: A). Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It lists 3 capabilities. It is Nerq Verified (trust score >= 70). It has 4,390 stars on github. Assessment: Highly trusted.
89.0
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
A MCP Server security verified

Trust Assessment

Highly Trusted — CursorTouch/Windows-MCP is among the top-rated MCP servers with excellent trust signals across security, compliance, and maintenance. It has been independently assessed by Nerq and shows consistently strong quality indicators.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 4,390 stars on github.

Capabilities

Details

AuthorCursorTouch
Categorysecurity
Stars4,390
Sourcehttps://github.com/CursorTouch/Windows-MCP
ProtocolMCP (Model Context Protocol)
Popularity#10 of 22026 MCP servers
Frameworksopenai · anthropic · mcp

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CursorTouch/Windows-MCP MCP server safe to use?
CursorTouch/Windows-MCP has a Nerq Trust Score of 89.0/100, earning a A grade. Highly Trusted — CursorTouch/Windows-MCP is among the top-rated MCP servers with excellent trust signals across security, compliance, and maintenance. It has been independently assessed by Nerq and shows consistently strong quality indicators. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meeting the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is CursorTouch/Windows-MCP's trust score?
Nerq assigns CursorTouch/Windows-MCP a trust score of 89.0 out of 100, with a grade of A. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (4,390 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to CursorTouch/Windows-MCP?
In the security category, no higher-rated MCP servers were found — this is among the top-rated. CursorTouch/Windows-MCP scores 89.0/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.

Badge Embed

Nerq Trust Score for CursorTouch/Windows-MCP

Add this trust badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/CursorTouch/Windows-MCP)](https://nerq.ai/mcp/cursortouchwindows-mcp)

Actions

Full KYA Report Preflight Check Safety Report

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.