Is Virtuelassistant Safe? — Trust Score: 59.2/100
According to Nerq's independent analysis of joeVenner/VirtuelAssistant, this communication has a trust score of 59.2 out of 100, earning a D grade. With 19 stars on github, it is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security score: 0/100. Compliance: 87/100 across 52 jurisdictions. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-18. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Virtuelassistant safe?
CAUTION — Virtuelassistant has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.2/100 (D). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Trust Assessment
Moderate — joeVenner/VirtuelAssistant shows mixed trust signals. Some areas are strong while others could be improved. We recommend reviewing the full KYA (Know Your Agent) report before integrating it into production workflows.
Trust Signal Breakdown
Details
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | communication |
| Stars | 19 |
| Source | https://github.com/joeVenner/VirtuelAssistant |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 87/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in communication
Community Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to review joeVenner/VirtuelAssistant.
What Is Virtuelassistant?
Virtuelassistant is a AI tool in the communication category. Python Virtual Assistant using voice commands.
As of March 2026, Virtuelassistant is available on github, making it an emerging tool in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.
How Nerq Assesses Virtuelassistant's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Virtuelassistant performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Virtuelassistant's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (0/100): Virtuelassistant is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (87/100): Virtuelassistant is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 59.2/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Virtuelassistant?
Virtuelassistant is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with communication tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Virtuelassistant is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Virtuelassistant's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Virtuelassistant's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Virtuelassistant requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Virtuelassistant in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=joeVenner/VirtuelAssistant - Review the license — Confirm that Virtuelassistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Virtuelassistant
When evaluating whether Virtuelassistant is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Virtuelassistant processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Virtuelassistant's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Virtuelassistant. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Virtuelassistant connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Virtuelassistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Virtuelassistant in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Virtuelassistant Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Virtuelassistant while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Virtuelassistant is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Virtuelassistant and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Virtuelassistant only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Virtuelassistant's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Virtuelassistant is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Virtuelassistant?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Virtuelassistant in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Virtuelassistant's trust score of 59.2/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Virtuelassistant Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among communication tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Virtuelassistant's score of 59.2/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Virtuelassistant in line with the typical communication tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Virtuelassistant and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Virtuelassistant's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Virtuelassistant's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=joeVenner/VirtuelAssistant&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Virtuelassistant are strengthening or weakening over time.
Virtuelassistant vs Alternatives
In the communication category, Virtuelassistant scores 59.2/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Virtuelassistant vs Real-Time-Voice-Cloning — Trust Score: 71.3/100
- Virtuelassistant vs ChatGPT — Trust Score: 73.8/100
- Virtuelassistant vs chatgpt-on-wechat — Trust Score: 80.7/100
Key Takeaways
- Virtuelassistant has a Trust Score of 59.2/100 (D) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Virtuelassistant shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among communication tools, Virtuelassistant scores near the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Add This Badge to YOUR Project
Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/safe/virtuelassistant)
Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.
pip install nerq && nerq scan
Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.
Related Safety Checks
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.