Is Cosmos Safe?
Cosmos — Nerq Trust Score 57.0/100 (F grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-03-31.
Use Cosmos with some caution. Cosmos is a software tool (moderate risk) with a Nerq Trust Score of 57.0/100 (F), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 65/100. Popularity: 5/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-31. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Cosmos safe?
CAUTION — Cosmos has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.0/100 (F). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
What is Cosmos's trust score?
Cosmos has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.0/100, earning a F grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Cosmos?
Cosmos's strongest signal is security at 65/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Cosmos and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | crypto |
| Source | N/A |
Cosmos Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Crypto by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Cosmos
What is Cosmos?
Cosmos is a software — Cosmos () cryptocurrency. Nerq risk level: moderate risk..
How to Verify Safety
Review the project for recent activity and known issues.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Cosmos
Key Safety Concerns for softwares
When evaluating any software, watch for: maintenance status, security.
Trust Assessment
Cosmos has a Nerq Trust Score of 57/100 (F) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Cosmos has a Trust Score of 57/100 (F).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 65/100 |
| Privacy | 40/100 |
| Reliability | 48/100 |
| Transparency | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Cosmos collect?
Cosmos has a privacy score of 40/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Cosmos Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Cosmos secure?
Security score: 65/100. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Cosmos Security Report
Cosmos Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Cosmos's trust score of 57.0/100 (F) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (65/100), privacy (40/100), reliability (48/100), transparency (90/100), maintenance (60/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on March 31, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cosmos safe to use?
What is Cosmos's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Cosmos?
How often is Cosmos's safety score updated?
Can I use Cosmos in a regulated environment?
Popular in crypto
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.