Is Flying Tulip Safe?
Flying Tulip — Nerq Trust Score 65.0/100 (F grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-01.
Use Flying Tulip with some caution. Flying Tulip is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 65.0/100 (F), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 65/100. Popularity: 5/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Flying Tulip safe?
CAUTION — Flying Tulip has a Nerq Trust Score of 65.0/100 (F). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
What is Flying Tulip's trust score?
Flying Tulip has a Nerq Trust Score of 65.0/100, earning a F grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Flying Tulip?
Flying Tulip's strongest signal is security at 65/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Flying Tulip and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | crypto |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Crypto by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Flying Tulip
What is Flying Tulip?
Flying Tulip is a software — Flying Tulip () cryptocurrency. Nerq risk level: low risk..
How to Verify Safety
Review the project for recent activity and known issues.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Flying Tulip
Key Safety Concerns for softwares
When evaluating any software, watch for: maintenance status, security.
Trust Assessment
Flying Tulip has a Nerq Trust Score of 65/100 (F) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Flying Tulip has a Trust Score of 65/100 (F).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 65/100 |
| Privacy | 40/100 |
| Reliability | 48/100 |
| Transparency | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Flying Tulip collect?
Flying Tulip has a privacy score of 40/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Flying Tulip Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Flying Tulip secure?
Security score: 65/100. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Flying Tulip Security Report
How we calculated this score
Flying Tulip's trust score of 65.0/100 (F) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (65/100), privacy (40/100), reliability (48/100), transparency (90/100), maintenance (60/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on April 01, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Flying Tulip safe to use?
What is Flying Tulip's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Flying Tulip?
How often is Flying Tulip's safety score updated?
Can I use Flying Tulip in a regulated environment?
Popular in crypto
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.