ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, ZKsync scores higher (by 4.3 points). ZKsync scores 62.1/100 (Grade B) and Flying Tulip scores 57.8/100 (Grade C+). This is not investment advice.
ZKsync (ZK) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 62.1/100, Grade B. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Flying Tulip (FT) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 57.8/100, Grade C+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), Flying Tulip has higher crash resistance. ZKsync Vitality: 28.6/100 (Grade D), Flying Tulip Vitality: 58.9/100 (Grade B). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | ZKsync full report → | Flying Tulip full report →