ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Zilliqa scores higher (by 0.1 points). Zilliqa scores 65.9/100 (Grade B) and Pepe scores 65.8/100 (Grade B). This is not investment advice.
Zilliqa (ZIL) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 65.9/100, Grade B. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Pepe (PEPE) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 65.8/100, Grade B. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), Pepe has higher crash resistance. Zilliqa Vitality: 30.9/100 (Grade D), Pepe Vitality: 36.2/100 (Grade D). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | Zilliqa full report → | Pepe full report →