ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Zano scores higher (by 4.8 points). Zano scores 61.7/100 (Grade B) and coco scores 56.9/100 (Grade C+). This is not investment advice.
Zano (ZANO) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 61.7/100, Grade B. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
coco (COCO) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 56.9/100, Grade C+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), Zano has higher crash resistance. Zano Vitality: 46.4/100 (Grade C), coco Vitality: 41.2/100 (Grade C). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | Zano full report → | coco full report →