ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Fluid scores higher (by 29.7 points). Fluid scores 58.9/100 (Grade C+) and Coreum scores 29.2/100 (Grade D). This is not investment advice.
Fluid (FLUID) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 58.9/100, Grade C+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Coreum (COREUM) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 29.2/100, Grade D. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), Fluid has higher crash resistance. Fluid Vitality: 41.0/100 (Grade C), Coreum Vitality: 40.3/100 (Grade C). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | Fluid full report → | Coreum full report →