Golem vs aelf

ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence

Golem scores higher by 0.9 points
GLM
Golem
74.2 B+
Trust Score / 100
Security (30%)55
Compliance (25%)95
Maintenance (20%)60
Popularity (15%)100
Ecosystem (10%)70
vs
ELF
aelf
73.3 B+
Trust Score / 100
Security (30%)35
Compliance (25%)87
Maintenance (20%)84
Popularity (15%)100
Ecosystem (10%)90

Crash Protection — Vitality Score

The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →

aelf is more crash-resistant by 10.8 points (Vitality Score)
GLM VITALITY
Golem
32.4 D
Vitality Score / 100
Stress Resilience (25%)49
Ecosystem Gravity (20%)30
Capital Commitment (20%)25
Coordination Efficiency (15%)10
Organic Momentum (20%)38
vs
ELF VITALITY
aelf
43.2 C
Vitality Score / 100
Stress Resilience (25%)49
Ecosystem Gravity (20%)30
Capital Commitment (20%)39
Coordination Efficiency (15%)40
Organic Momentum (20%)56

Golem market data

Price$0
Market Cap$134.71M
Rank#240
24h+3.9%
7d+4.0%
Audit✓ Yes

aelf market data

Price$0
Market Cap$54.19M
Rank#452
24h-9.2%
7d-3.1%
Audit✓ Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Golem or aelf?

Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Golem scores higher (by 0.9 points). Golem scores 74.2/100 (Grade B+) and aelf scores 73.3/100 (Grade B+). This is not investment advice.

What is the Trust Score for Golem?

Golem (GLM) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 74.2/100, Grade B+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.

What is the Trust Score for aelf?

aelf (ELF) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 73.3/100, Grade B+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.

Which is more crash-resistant, Golem or aelf?

Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), aelf has higher crash resistance. Golem Vitality: 32.4/100 (Grade D), aelf Vitality: 43.2/100 (Grade C). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.

Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology →  |  Golem full report →  |  aelf full report →