ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Flying Tulip scores higher (by 28.6 points). Flying Tulip scores 57.8/100 (Grade C+) and Coreum scores 29.2/100 (Grade D). This is not investment advice.
Flying Tulip (FT) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 57.8/100, Grade C+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Coreum (COREUM) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 29.2/100, Grade D. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), Flying Tulip has higher crash resistance. Flying Tulip Vitality: 64.7/100 (Grade B), Coreum Vitality: 40.3/100 (Grade C). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | Flying Tulip full report → | Coreum full report →