ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Flying Tulip scores higher (by 7.5 points). Flying Tulip scores 63.2/100 (Grade B) and Axie Infinity scores 55.7/100 (Grade C+). This is not investment advice.
Flying Tulip (FT) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 63.2/100, Grade B. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Axie Infinity (AXS) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 55.7/100, Grade C+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), Flying Tulip has higher crash resistance. Flying Tulip Vitality: 63.8/100 (Grade B), Axie Infinity Vitality: 33.5/100 (Grade D). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | Flying Tulip full report → | Axie Infinity full report →