Ethereum Name Service vs Quickswap [OLD]

ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence

Ethereum Name Service scores higher by 21.4 points
ENS
Ethereum Name Service
47.4 C
Trust Score / 100
Security (30%)15
Compliance (25%)76
Maintenance (20%)25
Popularity (15%)100
Ecosystem (10%)40
vs
QUICK
Quickswap [OLD]
26.0 D
Trust Score / 100
Security (30%)0
Compliance (25%)34
Maintenance (20%)12
Popularity (15%)94
Ecosystem (10%)10

Crash Protection — Vitality Score

The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →

Quickswap [OLD] is more crash-resistant by 12.3 points (Vitality Score)
ENS VITALITY
Ethereum Name Service
35.9 D
Vitality Score / 100
Stress Resilience (25%)49
Ecosystem Gravity (20%)50
Capital Commitment (20%)19
Coordination Efficiency (15%)10
Organic Momentum (20%)42
vs
QUICK VITALITY
Quickswap [OLD]
48.2 C
Vitality Score / 100
Stress Resilience (25%)59
Ecosystem Gravity (20%)N/A
Capital Commitment (20%)50
Coordination Efficiency (15%)40
Organic Momentum (20%)56

Ethereum Name Service market data

Price$6
Market Cap$233.21M
Rank#165
24h-0.1%
7d+0.8%
Audit✓ Yes

Quickswap [OLD] market data

Price$12
Market Cap$0
Rank#None
24h+1.7%
7d+3.2%
Audit✓ Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Ethereum Name Service or Quickswap [OLD]?

Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Ethereum Name Service scores higher (by 21.4 points). Ethereum Name Service scores 47.4/100 (Grade C) and Quickswap [OLD] scores 26.0/100 (Grade D). This is not investment advice.

What is the Trust Score for Ethereum Name Service?

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 47.4/100, Grade C. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.

What is the Trust Score for Quickswap [OLD]?

Quickswap [OLD] (QUICK) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 26.0/100, Grade D. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.

Which is more crash-resistant, Ethereum Name Service or Quickswap [OLD]?

Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), Quickswap [OLD] has higher crash resistance. Ethereum Name Service Vitality: 35.9/100 (Grade D), Quickswap [OLD] Vitality: 48.2/100 (Grade C). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.

Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology →  |  Ethereum Name Service full report →  |  Quickswap [OLD] full report →