ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Basic Attention scores higher (by 2.4 points). Basic Attention scores 78.5/100 (Grade B+) and Lido DAO scores 76.1/100 (Grade B+). This is not investment advice.
Basic Attention (BAT) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 78.5/100, Grade B+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Lido DAO (LDO) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 76.1/100, Grade B+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), Lido DAO has higher crash resistance. Basic Attention Vitality: 28.4/100 (Grade D), Lido DAO Vitality: 57.7/100 (Grade B). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | Basic Attention full report → | Lido DAO full report →