ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, Ape and Pepe scores higher (by 34.4 points). Ape and Pepe scores 57.0/100 (Grade C+) and SingularityDAO scores 22.6/100 (Grade D). This is not investment advice.
Ape and Pepe (APEPE) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 57.0/100, Grade C+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
SingularityDAO (SDAO) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 22.6/100, Grade D. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), SingularityDAO has higher crash resistance. Ape and Pepe Vitality: 39.6/100 (Grade D), SingularityDAO Vitality: 67.2/100 (Grade B). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | Ape and Pepe full report → | SingularityDAO full report →