ZARQ Trust Score comparison — independent crypto risk intelligence
The Vitality Score measures ecosystem health and crash resistance (0–100). Backtested: top-quintile tokens lost 44% less in the 2025–2026 crash (p<0.001). Full results →
Based on ZARQ's independent Trust Score, c8ntinuum scores higher (by 7.4 points). A7A5 scores 49.9/100 (Grade C) and c8ntinuum scores 57.3/100 (Grade C+). This is not investment advice.
A7A5 (A7A5) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 49.9/100, Grade C. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
c8ntinuum (CTM) has a ZARQ Trust Score of 57.3/100, Grade C+. Scored across Security, Compliance, Maintenance, Popularity, and Ecosystem dimensions.
Based on ZARQ's Vitality Score (backtested, p<0.001), A7A5 has higher crash resistance. A7A5 Vitality: 69.5/100 (Grade B), c8ntinuum Vitality: 46.4/100 (Grade C). In the 2025-2026 crash, top-quintile Vitality tokens lost 44% less than bottom-quintile. Not investment advice.
Data updated daily. Not investment advice. Methodology → | A7A5 full report → | c8ntinuum full report →