videosdk-live/agents Alternatives
Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-03-19.
videosdk-live/agents has a Nerq Trust Score of 87 (A). Open-source framework for building real-time multimodal conversational AI agents.
| # | Name | Trust | Grade | Stars | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenHands/software-agent-sdk | 89 | A | 568 | Higher trust (89 vs 87) |
| 2 | aws-samples/sample-agentic-frameworks-on-aws | 87 | A | 234 | Lower trust (87 vs 87) |
| 3 | lore | 85 | A | 22 | Lower trust (85 vs 87) |
| 4 | asklokesh/loki-mode | 84 | A | 665 | Lower trust (84 vs 87); More stars |
| 5 | rwjdk/MicrosoftAgentFrameworkSamples | 83 | A | 170 | Lower trust (83 vs 87) |
| 6 | ai-safe2-framework | 80 | A | 57 | Lower trust (80 vs 87) |
| 7 | SuperagenticAI/superoptix | 80 | A | 8 | Lower trust (80 vs 87) |
| 8 | cloudflare/agent-skills-discovery-rfc | 79 | B | 123 | Lower trust (79 vs 87) |
| 9 | llm4s/llm4s | 78 | B | 226 | Lower trust (78 vs 87) |
| 10 | Nubaeon/empirica | 78 | B | 166 | Lower trust (78 vs 87) |
| 11 | tetsuo-ai/AgenC | 78 | B | 105 | Lower trust (78 vs 87) |
| 12 | agents | 78 | B | 1 | Lower trust (78 vs 87) |
| 13 | satibot | 78 | B | 3 | Lower trust (78 vs 87) |
| 14 | EntityProcess/agentv | 77 | B | 11 | Lower trust (77 vs 87) |
| 15 | axcent | 77 | B | 2 | Lower trust (77 vs 87) |
Compare
- videosdk-live/agents vs OpenHands/software-agent-sdk
- videosdk-live/agents vs aws-samples/sample-agentic-frameworks-on-aws
- videosdk-live/agents vs lore
- videosdk-live/agents vs asklokesh/loki-mode
- videosdk-live/agents vs rwjdk/MicrosoftAgentFrameworkSamples
FAQ
What are the best alternatives to videosdk-live/agents?
The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.
Is it safe to switch from videosdk-live/agents?
Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.
How does Nerq rank videosdk-live/agents alternatives?
Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.