qax-os/excelize Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-03-19.

qax-os/excelize has a Nerq Trust Score of 86 (A). Go language library for reading and writing Microsoft Excel™ (XLAM / XLSM / XLSX / XLTM / XLTX) spreadsheets

#NameTrustGradeStarsKey Difference
1PromptX90A3.6kHigher trust (90 vs 86)
2microsoft/CyberBattleSim88A1.8kHigher trust (88 vs 86)
3elevenlabs/ui87A2.0kHigher trust (87 vs 86)
4warengonzaga/tinyclaw84A71Lower trust (84 vs 86)
5awesome-openclaw-usecases84A1.8kLower trust (84 vs 86)
6doramirdor/NadirClaw81A146Lower trust (81 vs 86)
7awesome-ai-apps81A719Lower trust (81 vs 86)
8VincentKaufmann/noapi-google-search-mcp81A59Lower trust (81 vs 86)
9Kocoro-lab/Shannon80A1.0kLower trust (80 vs 86)
10ai-hr-policy-agent80A-Lower trust (80 vs 86)
11beads_viewer80A1.2kLower trust (80 vs 86)
12openlit/openlit80B2.3kLower trust (80 vs 86)
13risingwavelabs/risingwave80B8.8kLower trust (80 vs 86)
14szczyglis-dev/py-gpt80B1.6kLower trust (80 vs 86)
15calesthio/Crucix79B415Lower trust (79 vs 86)

Compare

FAQ

What are the best alternatives to qax-os/excelize?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from qax-os/excelize?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank qax-os/excelize alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.

Also explore

Nerq Trust Protocol AI Compliance Hub Know Your Agent Crypto Vitality Rankings Crash Watch: Live Alerts Real-Time Token Scanner