CursorTouch/Windows-MCP Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-03-19.

CursorTouch/Windows-MCP has a Nerq Trust Score of 88 (A). MCP Server for Computer Use in Windows

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	promptfoo/promptfoo	93	A+	17.3k	Higher trust (93 vs 88); Much larger community
2	SWE-agent/SWE-agent	91	A+	18.5k	Higher trust (91 vs 88); Much larger community
3	FunnyWolf/agentic-soc-platform	90	A+	579	Higher trust (90 vs 88)
4	raptor	89	A	1.1k	Higher trust (89 vs 88)
5	GreyDGL/PentestGPT	88	A	11.7k	Higher trust (88 vs 88); Much larger community
6	clawsec	87	A	542	Lower trust (87 vs 88)
7	cisco-ai-defense/mcp-scanner	87	A	809	Lower trust (87 vs 88)
8	cyproxio/mcp-for-security	87	A	553	Lower trust (87 vs 88)
9	samugit83/redamon	86	A	1.1k	Lower trust (86 vs 88)
10	santosomar/AI-agents-for-cybersecurity	86	A	146	Lower trust (86 vs 88)
11	mcp-scan	86	A	1.5k	Lower trust (86 vs 88)
12	SHAdd0WTAka/Zen-Ai-Pentest	86	A	256	Lower trust (86 vs 88)
13	six2dez/burp-ai-agent	85	A	640	Lower trust (85 vs 88)
14	slither-mcp	85	A	71	Lower trust (85 vs 88)
15	vxcontrol/pentagi	84	A	7.3k	Lower trust (84 vs 88); More stars

Compare

What are the best alternatives to CursorTouch/Windows-MCP?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from CursorTouch/Windows-MCP?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank CursorTouch/Windows-MCP alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.