What is peeking_take_while?

50/100
Trust Score (D)
⚠️ Use Caution

peeking_take_while is a crates that Like `Iterator::take_while`, but calls the predicate on a peeked value. This allows you to use `Iterator::by_ref` and `Iterator::take_while` together, and still get the first value for which the `take. It has a Nerq Trust Score of 50/100 (D). 0 GitHub stars. Published by Unknown. Last analyzed March 2026.

Why This Score

Trust & Safety Overview

50
TRUST SCORE
D
GRADE
0
STARS
0
DOWNLOADS

What peeking_take_while Does

peeking_take_while is a crates in the crates category. Like `Iterator::take_while`, but calls the predicate on a peeked value. This allows you to use `Iterator::by_ref` and `Iterator::take_while` together, and still get the first value for which the `take_while` predicate returned false after dropping the `by_ref`.. It is published by Unknown and has no specified license. With 0 GitHub stars and 0 downloads, it has a small community of users and contributors.

Who Should Use peeking_take_while

peeking_take_while is recommended only for experimental use. Consider alternatives with higher trust scores for production systems.

Details

AuthorUnknown
Categorycrates
LicenseNot specified
Typecrates
SourceView on GitHub
Security Score0/100
Activity Score0/100

How to Get Started

Check the trust score before installing:

curl nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=peeking-take-while

Setup guide · Full safety report · Production review · Is it safe?

Frequently Asked Questions

What is peeking_take_while used for?
peeking_take_while is a crates tool. Like `Iterator::take_while`, but calls the predicate on a peeked value. This allows you to use `Iterator::by_ref` and `Iterator::take_while` together, and still get the first value for which the `take.
Is peeking_take_while free?
License: Check project page. peeking_take_while has 0 GitHub stars.
Is peeking_take_while safe?
peeking_take_while has a Nerq Trust Score of 50/100 (D). Evaluate carefully.
What are alternatives to peeking_take_while?
Top alternatives: . See full comparison.

Last updated March 2026. Trust scores based on automated analysis of public data.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy