Is Open Assistant Safe?

Open Assistant — Nerq Trust Score 54.1/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 4 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-09.

Use Open Assistant with some caution. Open Assistant is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 54.1/100 (D), based on 4 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-05-09. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Open Assistant safe?

CAUTION — Open Assistant has a Nerq Trust Score of 54.1/100 (D). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Open Assistant Privacy Report →

What is Open Assistant's trust score?

Open Assistant has a Nerq Trust Score of 54.1/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 4 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Compliance
87
Maintenance
0
Documentation
0
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Open Assistant?

Open Assistant's strongest signal is compliance at 87/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Maintenance: 0/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 87/100 — covers 45 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — 4 stars on huggingface dataset v2

What is Open Assistant and who maintains it?

AuthorTinyPixel
CategoryAi Assistant
Stars4
Sourcehttps://huggingface.co/datasets/TinyPixel/open-assistant
Protocolshuggingface_api

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score87/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

What Is Open Assistant?

Open Assistant is a software tool in the ai_assistant category: Open-Assistant is an AI assistant.. It has 4 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 54/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Open Assistant's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Open Assistant performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 54.1/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Open Assistant?

Open Assistant is designed for:

Risk guidance: Open Assistant is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Open Assistant's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Open Assistant's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Open Assistant requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Open Assistant in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=open-assistant
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Open Assistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Open Assistant

When evaluating whether Open Assistant is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Open Assistant processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Open Assistant's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Open Assistant. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Open Assistant connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Open Assistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Open Assistant in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Open Assistant Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Open Assistant while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Open Assistant is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Open Assistant and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Open Assistant only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Open Assistant's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Open Assistant is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Open Assistant?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Open Assistant in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Open Assistant's trust score of 54.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Open Assistant Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among ai_assistant tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Open Assistant's score of 54.1/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Open Assistant in line with the typical ai_assistant tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Open Assistant and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Open Assistant's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Open Assistant's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=open-assistant&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Open Assistant are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

Detailed Score Analysis

DimensionScore
Maintenance0/100
Popularity0/100

Based on 2 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.

What data does Open Assistant collect?

Privacy assessment for Open Assistant is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.

Is Open Assistant secure?

Security score: under assessment. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.

Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.

Full analysis: Open Assistant Security Report

How we calculated this score

Open Assistant's trust score of 54.1/100 (D) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 2 independent dimensions: maintenance (0/100), popularity (0/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on May 09, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Open Assistant Safe?
Use with some caution. open-assistant with a Nerq Trust Score of 54.1/100 (D). Strongest signal: compliance (87/100). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100).
What is Open Assistant's trust score?
open-assistant: 54.1/100 (D). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100). Compliance: 87/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=open-assistant
What are safer alternatives to Open Assistant?
In the Ai Assistant category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. open-assistant scores 54.1/100.
How often is Open Assistant's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Open Assistant and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 54.1/100 (D), last verified 2026-05-09. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=open-assistant
Can I use Open Assistant in a regulated environment?
Open Assistant has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy