Is mcp-sideport Safe? — Trust Score: 83.3/100
Independent safety assessment for mcp-sideport. Category: coding. Source: github.
mcp-sideport is a coding agent with a Nerq Trust Score of 83.3/100 (grade: A). Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified (trust score >= 70). Assessment: Trusted — strong signals.
83.3
out of 100
A
coding
github
verified
Trust Assessment
Trusted — mcp-sideport demonstrates strong trust signals. It meets the threshold for Nerq Verified status, indicating solid security practices, active maintenance, and a healthy ecosystem presence.
Trust Signal Breakdown
Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 0 stars on github.
Details
| Author | Clockwork-Innovations |
| Category | coding |
| Stars | 0 |
| Source | https://github.com/Clockwork-Innovations/mcp-sideport |
| Frameworks | mcp |
| Protocols | mcp · rest |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Safer Alternatives in coding
ccmanager
90.9/100 · A+
github
agentgateway/agentgateway
89.8/100 · A
github
ruler
89.5/100 · A
github
RooCodeInc/Roo-Code
89.5/100 · A
github
livekit/agents-js
89.5/100 · A
github
Community Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to review mcp-sideport.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is mcp-sideport safe to use?
mcp-sideport has a Nerq Trust Score of 83.3/100, earning a A grade. Trusted — mcp-sideport demonstrates strong trust signals. It meets the threshold for Nerq Verified status, indicating solid security practices, active maintenance, and a healthy ecosystem presence. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meaning it meets the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before using any AI agent in production.
What is mcp-sideport's trust score?
Nerq assigns mcp-sideport a trust score of 83.3 out of 100, with a grade of A. This score is computed from multiple dimensions including security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (0 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there safer alternatives to mcp-sideport?
In the coding category, higher-rated alternatives include ccmanager, agentgateway/agentgateway, ruler (scores: 91, 90, 90). mcp-sideport scores 83.3/100. When choosing between agents, consider your specific requirements for security (N/A), maintenance activity (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's comparison tools or the KYA endpoint for detailed side-by-side analysis.
Badge Embed
Add this trust badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/safe/mcp-sideport)
Actions
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.