Is Mcp Server Asana Safe?
Mcp Server Asana — Nerq Trust Score 73.6/100 (B grade). Based on analysis of 5 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-02.
Yes, Mcp Server Asana is safe to use. Mcp Server Asana is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 73.6/100 (B), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Recommended for use. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-05-02. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Mcp Server Asana safe?
YES — Mcp Server Asana has a Nerq Trust Score of 73.6/100 (B). It meets Nerq's trust threshold with strong signals across security, maintenance, and community adoption. Recommended for use — review the full report below for specific considerations.
What is Mcp Server Asana's trust score?
Mcp Server Asana has a Nerq Trust Score of 73.6/100, earning a B grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Mcp Server Asana?
Mcp Server Asana's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Mcp Server Asana and who maintains it?
| Author | 84emllc |
| Category | Uncategorized |
| Source | https://github.com/84emllc/mcp-server-asana |
| Frameworks | anthropic · mcp |
| Protocols | mcp · rest |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
What Is Mcp Server Asana?
Mcp Server Asana is a software tool in the uncategorized category: MCP server for Asana - task, project, and workspace management via Model Context Protocol. Nerq Trust Score: 74/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Mcp Server Asana's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Mcp Server Asana performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Mcp Server Asana's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (0/100): Mcp Server Asana is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Mcp Server Asana is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 73.6/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Mcp Server Asana?
Mcp Server Asana is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Mcp Server Asana meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for security advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Mcp Server Asana's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Mcp Server Asana's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Mcp Server Asana requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Mcp Server Asana in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=mcp-server-asana - Review the license — Confirm that Mcp Server Asana's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Mcp Server Asana
When evaluating whether Mcp Server Asana is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Mcp Server Asana processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Mcp Server Asana's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Mcp Server Asana. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Mcp Server Asana connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Mcp Server Asana's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Mcp Server Asana in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Mcp Server Asana Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Mcp Server Asana while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Mcp Server Asana is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Mcp Server Asana and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Mcp Server Asana only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Mcp Server Asana's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Mcp Server Asana is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Mcp Server Asana?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Mcp Server Asana in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Mcp Server Asana's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive security updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Mcp Server Asana's trust score of 73.6/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Mcp Server Asana Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Mcp Server Asana's score of 73.6/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.
This places Mcp Server Asana in the top tier of uncategorized tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature security practices, consistent release cadence, and broad community adoption.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Mcp Server Asana and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Mcp Server Asana's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Mcp Server Asana's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=mcp-server-asana&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Mcp Server Asana are strengthening or weakening over time.
Key Takeaways
- Mcp Server Asana has a Trust Score of 73.6/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Mcp Server Asana meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among uncategorized tools, Mcp Server Asana scores significantly above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 0/100 |
| Maintenance | 0/100 |
| Popularity | 0/100 |
Based on 3 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Mcp Server Asana collect?
Privacy assessment for Mcp Server Asana is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Mcp Server Asana secure?
Security score: 0/100. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Mcp Server Asana Security Report
How we calculated this score
Mcp Server Asana's trust score of 73.6/100 (B) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 3 independent dimensions: security (0/100), maintenance (0/100), popularity (0/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on May 02, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mcp Server Asana Safe?
What is Mcp Server Asana's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Mcp Server Asana?
How often is Mcp Server Asana's safety score updated?
Can I use Mcp Server Asana in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.