Is Goclaw Safe? — Trust Score: 80.5/100
Why This Score
- Security score: 0/100 (weak)
- Maintenance: 1/100 — low maintenance activity
- Compliance: 84/100 — covers 43 of 52 jurisdictions
- Documentation: 1/100 — limited documentation
- Popularity: 1/100 — 143 stars on github
According to Nerq's independent analysis of goclaw, this agent_framework has a trust score of 80.5 out of 100, earning a A grade. With 143 stars on github, it is recommended for production use. Security score: 0/100. Compliance: 84/100 across 52 jurisdictions. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-19. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Goclaw safe?
YES — Goclaw has a Nerq Trust Score of 80.5/100 (A). It meets Nerq's trust threshold with strong signals across security, maintenance, and community adoption. Recommended for production use — review the full report below for specific considerations.
Trust Assessment
Trusted — goclaw demonstrates strong trust signals. It meets the threshold for Nerq Verified status, indicating solid security practices, active maintenance, and a healthy ecosystem presence.
Trust Signal Breakdown
Details
| Author | smallnest |
| Category | agent_framework |
| Stars | 143 |
| Source | https://github.com/smallnest/goclaw |
| Frameworks | openai · anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in agent_framework
Community Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to review goclaw.
What Is Goclaw?
Goclaw is a framework for building autonomous AI agents that can reason and take actions. An open-source AI assistant framework in Go.
As of March 2026, Goclaw has 143 stars on github, making it an emerging tool in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.
How Nerq Assesses Goclaw's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Goclaw performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Goclaw's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Goclaw is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Goclaw is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (1/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 80.5/100 (A) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Goclaw?
Goclaw is designed for:
- AI engineers building autonomous agent systems
- Research teams experimenting with multi-agent architectures
- Companies creating AI-powered automation workflows
Risk guidance: Goclaw is well-suited for production environments. Its high trust score indicates robust security, active maintenance, and strong community support. Standard security practices (dependency pinning, access controls, monitoring) are still recommended.
How to Verify Goclaw's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Goclaw's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Goclaw requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Goclaw in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=goclaw - Review the license — Confirm that Goclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Goclaw
When evaluating whether Goclaw is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Agent frameworks like Goclaw can take actions autonomously — executing code, calling APIs, modifying files. Always implement guardrails and human-in-the-loop controls for production deployments.
AI agents built with Goclaw may be vulnerable to prompt injection attacks where malicious input causes the agent to take unintended actions. Test for adversarial inputs before deploying.
Autonomous agents can incur unexpected API costs or resource usage. Set budget limits and monitoring alerts when deploying Goclaw-based agents.
When using Goclaw to orchestrate multiple agents, failures in inter-agent communication can lead to cascading errors, duplicated actions, or deadlocks. Implement circuit breakers and timeout mechanisms to prevent runaway agent loops that can consume resources indefinitely.
Agents built with Goclaw that persist memory across sessions can have their context poisoned by adversarial inputs. Once corrupted, the agent may make consistently poor decisions in future interactions. Implement memory validation and periodic context resets for long-running agents.
Best Practices for Using Goclaw Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Goclaw while minimizing risk:
Configure Goclaw agents to require human approval for high-impact actions like payments, data deletion, or external API calls.
Autonomous agents built with Goclaw can incur unexpected costs through API calls and resource usage. Set hard spending limits and rate caps.
Log all actions taken by agents built with Goclaw. Use observability tools to detect anomalous behavior patterns that could indicate prompt injection or logic errors.
Before deploying Goclaw-based agents in production, test with adversarial prompts designed to bypass guardrails and cause unintended actions.
Each agent should have the minimum permissions required. Never give an agent root access, admin credentials, or unrestricted API keys.
When Should You Avoid Goclaw?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Goclaw in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Goclaw's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive security updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Goclaw's trust score of 80.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Goclaw Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among agent frameworks, the average Trust Score is 65/100. Goclaw's score of 80.5/100 is significantly above the category average of 65/100.
This places Goclaw in the top tier of agent frameworks that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature security practices, consistent release cadence, and broad community adoption.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Goclaw and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Goclaw's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Goclaw's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=goclaw&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Goclaw are strengthening or weakening over time.
Goclaw vs Alternatives
In the agent_framework category, Goclaw scores 80.5/100. It ranks among the top tools in its category. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Goclaw vs crewAI — Trust Score: 92.1/100
- Goclaw vs hashbrown — Trust Score: 77.4/100
- Goclaw vs AutoAgents — Trust Score: 82.1/100
Key Takeaways
- Goclaw has a Trust Score of 80.5/100 (A) and is Nerq Verified.
- Goclaw demonstrates strong trust signals and is well-suited for production use with standard security precautions.
- Among agent frameworks, Goclaw scores significantly above the category average of 65/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Safer Alternatives
Higher-rated agent_framework agents you may want to consider:
Frequently Asked Questions
Add This Badge to YOUR Project
Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/safe/goclaw)
Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.
pip install nerq && nerq scan
Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.
Related Safety Checks
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.