Is Capricorn Medical Research Safe? — Trust Score: 47.0/100
According to Nerq's independent analysis of WandLZhang/capricorn-medical-research, this health has a trust score of 47.0 out of 100, earning a D grade. With 3 stars on github, it is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security score: 0/100. Compliance: 42/100 across 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act classification: minimal. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-19. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Capricorn Medical Research safe?
NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Capricorn Medical Research has a Nerq Trust Score of 47.0/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.
Trust Assessment
Caution — WandLZhang/capricorn-medical-research has below-average trust signals. There may be concerns around maintenance frequency, security practices, or ecosystem adoption. Proceed with care and conduct additional due diligence.
Trust Signal Breakdown
Details
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | health |
| Stars | 3 |
| Source | https://github.com/WandLZhang/capricorn-medical-research |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 42/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in health
Community Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to review WandLZhang/capricorn-medical-research.
What Is Capricorn Medical Research?
Capricorn Medical Research is a AI tool in the health category. An AI-driven medical research application for pediatric oncology.
As of March 2026, Capricorn Medical Research is available on github, making it an emerging tool in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.
How Nerq Assesses Capricorn Medical Research's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Capricorn Medical Research performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Capricorn Medical Research's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (0/100): Capricorn Medical Research is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (42/100): Capricorn Medical Research is compliance gaps exist. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 47.0/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Capricorn Medical Research?
Capricorn Medical Research is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with health tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: We recommend caution with Capricorn Medical Research. The low trust score suggests potential risks in security, maintenance, or community support. Consider using a more established alternative for any production or sensitive workload.
How to Verify Capricorn Medical Research's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Capricorn Medical Research's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Capricorn Medical Research requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Capricorn Medical Research in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=WandLZhang/capricorn-medical-research - Review the license — Confirm that Capricorn Medical Research's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Capricorn Medical Research
When evaluating whether Capricorn Medical Research is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Capricorn Medical Research processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Capricorn Medical Research's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Capricorn Medical Research. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Capricorn Medical Research connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Capricorn Medical Research's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Capricorn Medical Research in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Capricorn Medical Research and the EU AI Act
Capricorn Medical Research is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Capricorn Medical Research Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Capricorn Medical Research while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Capricorn Medical Research is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Capricorn Medical Research and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Capricorn Medical Research only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Capricorn Medical Research's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Capricorn Medical Research is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Capricorn Medical Research?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Capricorn Medical Research in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Capricorn Medical Research's trust score of 47.0/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Capricorn Medical Research Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among health tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Capricorn Medical Research's score of 47.0/100 is below the category average of 62/100.
This suggests that Capricorn Medical Research trails behind many comparable health tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Capricorn Medical Research and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Capricorn Medical Research's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Capricorn Medical Research's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=WandLZhang/capricorn-medical-research&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Capricorn Medical Research are strengthening or weakening over time.
Capricorn Medical Research vs Alternatives
In the health category, Capricorn Medical Research scores 47.0/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Capricorn Medical Research vs MedicalGPT — Trust Score: 62.6/100
- Capricorn Medical Research vs open-health — Trust Score: 62.6/100
- Capricorn Medical Research vs Awesome-AI4Med — Trust Score: 62.6/100
Key Takeaways
- Capricorn Medical Research has a Trust Score of 47.0/100 (D) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Capricorn Medical Research has significant trust gaps. Consider higher-rated alternatives unless specific requirements mandate its use.
- Among health tools, Capricorn Medical Research scores below the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Add This Badge to YOUR Project
Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/safe/capricorn)
Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.
pip install nerq && nerq scan
Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.
Related Safety Checks
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.