Is Amp Safe?
Amp — Nerq Trust Score 60.8/100 (C+ grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-01.
Use Amp with some caution. Amp is a WordPress plugin with a Nerq Trust Score of 60.8/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 65/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Amp safe?
CAUTION — Amp has a Nerq Trust Score of 60.8/100 (C+). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
What is Amp's trust score?
Amp has a Nerq Trust Score of 60.8/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Amp?
Amp's strongest signal is popularity at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Amp and who maintains it?
| Author | Weston Ruter |
| Category | wordpress |
| Source | N/A |
Amp Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Wordpress by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Amp
What is Amp?
Amp is a WordPress plugin — An easier path to great Page Experience for everyone. Powered by AMP..
How to Verify Safety
Check WordPress.org for support response time, tested WP version. Cross-reference with WPScan.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=AMP
Key Safety Concerns for WordPress plugins
When evaluating any WordPress plugin, watch for: known vulnerabilities, PHP compatibility, plugin conflicts.
Trust Assessment
Amp has a Nerq Trust Score of 61/100 (C+) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Amp has a Trust Score of 61/100 (C+).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 65/100 |
| Privacy | 70/100 |
| Reliability | 100/100 |
| Transparency | 75/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history.
What data does Amp collect?
Amp has a privacy score of 70/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Amp Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Amp secure?
Security score: 65/100. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Amp Security Report
Amp Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Amp's trust score of 60.8/100 (C+) is computed from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (65/100), privacy (70/100), reliability (100/100), transparency (75/100), maintenance (60/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on April 01, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Amp safe?
What is Amp's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Amp?
Does Amp have known vulnerabilities?
Is Amp compatible with the latest WordPress?
Popular in wordpress
Browse Categories
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.