Trust Assessment
Trusted — physbound demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption.
Is physbound MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 82.0/100
Independent trust assessment for the physbound MCP server. Category: infrastructure. Source: github.
physbound is a infrastructure MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 82.0/100 (grade: A). Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It lists 3 capabilities. It is Nerq Verified (trust score >= 70). Assessment: Trusted — strong signals.
82.0
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
A
MCP Server
infrastructure
verified
Trust Signal Breakdown
Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 0 stars on github.
Capabilities
- MCP server
- validation of RF and physics calculations
- AI hallucination detection
Details
| Author | JonesRobM |
| Category | infrastructure |
| Stars | 0 |
| Source | https://github.com/JonesRobM/physbound |
| Protocol | MCP (Model Context Protocol) |
| Popularity | #374 of 22026 MCP servers |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
Higher-Rated MCP Servers in infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
Is physbound MCP server safe to use?
physbound has a Nerq Trust Score of 82.0/100, earning a A grade. Trusted — physbound demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meeting the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is physbound's trust score?
Nerq assigns physbound a trust score of 82.0 out of 100, with a grade of A. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (0 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to physbound?
In the infrastructure category, higher-rated MCP servers include williamzujkowski/strudel-mcp-server, harbor, mcp-docs-service (scores: 93, 90, 88). physbound scores 82.0/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.
Badge Embed
Add this trust badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/mcp/physbound)
Actions
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.