Trust Assessment
Trusted — claude-review-automation demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption.
Is claude-review-automation MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 80.2/100
Independent trust assessment for the claude-review-automation MCP server. Category: coding. Source: github.
claude-review-automation is a coding MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 80.2/100 (grade: A). Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It lists 3 capabilities. It is Nerq Verified (trust score >= 70). It has 2 stars on github. Assessment: Trusted — strong signals.
80.2
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
A
MCP Server
coding
verified
Trust Signal Breakdown
Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 2 stars on github.
Capabilities
- code review
- automated review
- AI-driven analysis
Details
| Author | DGouron |
| Category | coding |
| Stars | 2 |
| Source | https://github.com/DGouron/claude-review-automation |
| Protocol | MCP (Model Context Protocol) |
| Popularity | #247 of 22026 MCP servers |
| Frameworks | anthropic · mcp |
Higher-Rated MCP Servers in coding
Frequently Asked Questions
Is claude-review-automation MCP server safe to use?
claude-review-automation has a Nerq Trust Score of 80.2/100, earning a A grade. Trusted — claude-review-automation demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meeting the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is claude-review-automation's trust score?
Nerq assigns claude-review-automation a trust score of 80.2 out of 100, with a grade of A. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (2 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to claude-review-automation?
In the coding category, higher-rated MCP servers include minecraft-mcp-server, spences10/mcp-omnisearch, mcp-manager (scores: 88, 88, 86). claude-review-automation scores 80.2/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.
Badge Embed
Add this trust badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/mcp/claude-review-automation)
Actions
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.