Is Tree Sitter Java Safe?

Tree Sitter Java — Nerq Trust Score 59.8/100 (C grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-05.

Use Tree Sitter Java with some caution. Tree Sitter Java is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-21. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Tree Sitter Java safe?

CAUTION — Tree Sitter Java has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Tree Sitter Java Privacy Report →

What is Tree Sitter Java's trust score?

Tree Sitter Java has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
90

What are the key security findings for Tree Sitter Java?

Tree Sitter Java's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 90/100 — community adoption

What is Tree Sitter Java and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

pnet_base (63)once_cell (63)postgres-types (63)gloo-utils (63)rand_core (63)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Tree Sitter Java vs pnet_baseTree Sitter Java vs once_cellTree Sitter Java vs postgres-types

Safety Guide: Tree Sitter Java

What is Tree Sitter Java?

Tree Sitter Java is a Rust crate — Java grammar for tree-sitter.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-java

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Tree Sitter Java has a Nerq Trust Score of 60/100 (C) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Detailed Score Analysis

DimensionScore
Security90/100
Maintenance50/100
Popularity90/100
Quality30/100
Community35/100

Based on 5 dimensions. Data from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database.

What data does Tree Sitter Java collect?

Privacy assessment for Tree Sitter Java is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.

Is Tree Sitter Java secure?

Security score: 90/100. Tree Sitter Java has 0 known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the National Vulnerability Database. This is a clean record.

License information not available. Open-source packages allow independent security review of the source code.

Run your package manager's audit command (`npm audit`, `pip audit`, `cargo audit`) to check for known vulnerabilities in your dependency tree.

Full analysis: Tree Sitter Java Security Report

How we calculated this score

Tree Sitter Java's trust score of 59.8/100 (C) is computed from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (90/100), quality (30/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on May 05, 2026. Data version: 0.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tree Sitter Java Safe?
Use with some caution. tree-sitter-java with a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100 (C). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100).
What is Tree Sitter Java's trust score?
tree-sitter-java: 59.8/100 (C). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-java
What are safer alternatives to Tree Sitter Java?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. tree-sitter-java scores 59.8/100.
Does Tree Sitter Java have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Tree Sitter Java against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Tree Sitter Java use unsafe code?
Check Tree Sitter Java's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 59.8/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy