Is Common Safe?

Common — Nerq Trust Score 55.2/100 (C grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-02.

Use Common with some caution. Common is a Rust crate (this is buffett common lib) with a Nerq Trust Score of 55.2/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 60/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-04-02. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Common safe?

CAUTION — Common has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.2/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → {name} Privacy Report →

What is Common's trust score?

Common has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.2/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
60

What are the key security findings for Common?

Common's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 60/100 — community adoption

What is Common and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
Categorycrates
SourceN/A

Common Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

Common
46/100 · nuget

Similar Crates by Trust Score

data-encoding (63)opaque-debug (63)async-stream (63)unindent (63)simd-adler32 (63)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Common vs data-encodingCommon vs opaque-debugCommon vs async-stream

Safety Guide: Common

What is Common?

Common is a Rust crate — this is buffett common lib.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=common

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crates

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Common has a Nerq Trust Score of 55/100 (C) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Common safe to use?
Use with some caution. common has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.2/100 (C). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on security (90/100), popularity (60/100).
What is Common's trust score?
common: 55.2/100 (C). Score based on: security (90/100), popularity (60/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=common
What are safer alternatives to Common?
In the crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. common scores 55.2/100.
Does Common have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Common against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Common use unsafe code?
Check Common's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 55.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy