Is Bitflags Safe?

Bitflags — Nerq Trust Score 63.2/100 (C+ grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-07.

Use Bitflags with some caution. Bitflags is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 100/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Bitflags safe?

CAUTION — Bitflags has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100 (C+). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Bitflags Privacy Report →

What is Bitflags's trust score?

Bitflags has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
100

What are the key security findings for Bitflags?

Bitflags's strongest signal is popularity at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 100/100 — community adoption

What is Bitflags and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Bitflags Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

bitflags
63/100 · pypi

Similar Crates by Trust Score

pnet_base (63)once_cell (63)postgres-types (63)gloo-utils (63)rand_core (63)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Bitflags vs pnet_baseBitflags vs once_cellBitflags vs postgres-types

Safety Guide: Bitflags

What is Bitflags?

Bitflags is a Rust crate — A macro to generate structures which behave like bitflags. .

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=bitflags

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Bitflags has a Nerq Trust Score of 63/100 (C+) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Detailed Score Analysis

DimensionScore
Security90/100
Maintenance50/100
Popularity100/100
Quality40/100
Community35/100

Based on 5 dimensions. Data from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database.

What data does Bitflags collect?

Bitflags is a Rust crate maintained by Unknown. It receives approximately 1,122,210,058 weekly downloads.

As a development package, Bitflags does not directly collect end-user personal data. However, applications built with it may collect data depending on implementation. Privacy score: 80/100.

Review the package's dependencies for potential supply chain risks. Run your package manager's audit command regularly.

Full analysis: Bitflags Privacy Report · Privacy review

Is Bitflags secure?

Security score: 90/100. Bitflags has 0 known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the National Vulnerability Database. This is a clean record.

License information not available. Open-source packages allow independent security review of the source code.

Run your package manager's audit command (`npm audit`, `pip audit`, `cargo audit`) to check for known vulnerabilities in your dependency tree.

Full analysis: Bitflags Security Report

Bitflags Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

bitflags (pypi, 63/100)

How we calculated this score

Bitflags's trust score of 63.2/100 (C+) is computed from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (100/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on May 07, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bitflags Safe?
Use with some caution. bitflags with a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100 (C+). Strongest signal: popularity (100/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (100/100).
What is Bitflags's trust score?
bitflags: 63.2/100 (C+). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (100/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=bitflags
What are safer alternatives to Bitflags?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. bitflags scores 63.2/100.
Does Bitflags have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Bitflags against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Bitflags use unsafe code?
Check Bitflags's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 63.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy