supabase vs linear-claude-skill — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of supabase and linear-claude-skill. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

supabase scores 62.4/100 (C) while linear-claude-skill scores 67.2/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. linear-claude-skill leads by 4.8 points. supabase is a infrastructure tool with 97,942 stars. linear-claude-skill is a coding tool with 42 stars.
62.4
C
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars97,942
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance92
Maintenance0
Documentation0
vs
67.2
C
Categorycoding
Stars42
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric supabase linear-claude-skill
Trust Score62.4/10067.2/100
GradeCC
Stars97,94242
Categoryinfrastructurecoding
Security00
Compliance92100
Maintenance01
Documentation01
EU AI Act RiskN/Aminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

linear-claude-skill leads with a trust score of 67.2/100 compared to supabase's 62.4/100 (a 4.8-point difference). linear-claude-skill scores higher on compliance (100 vs 92), maintenance (1 vs 0). However, supabase has stronger community adoption (97,942 vs 42 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

supabase leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to linear-claude-skill's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

linear-claude-skill demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

linear-claude-skill has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

supabase has 97,942 GitHub stars while linear-claude-skill has 42. supabase has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose supabase if you need:

  • Larger community (97,942 vs 42 stars)

Choose linear-claude-skill if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from supabase to linear-claude-skill (or vice versa)

When migrating between supabase and linear-claude-skill, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: supabase (infrastructure) and linear-claude-skill (coding) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the supabase safety report and linear-claude-skill safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: supabase has 97,942 stars and linear-claude-skill has 42. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
supabase Safety Report linear-claude-skill Safety Report supabase Alternatives linear-claude-skill Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, supabase or linear-claude-skill?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, supabase has a trust score of 62.4/100 (C) while linear-claude-skill scores 67.2/100 (C). The 4.8-point difference suggests linear-claude-skill has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do supabase and linear-claude-skill compare on security?
supabase has a security score of 0/100 and linear-claude-skill scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. supabase's compliance score is 92/100 (EU risk: N/A), while linear-claude-skill's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use supabase or linear-claude-skill?
The choice depends on your requirements. supabase (infrastructure, 97,942 stars) and linear-claude-skill (coding, 42 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, supabase scores 62.4/100 and linear-claude-skill scores 67.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 1), and maintenance activity (0 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-16 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy