IndexGPT vs stable-hash — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of IndexGPT and stable-hash. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

IndexGPT scores 64.2/100 (C) while stable-hash scores 56.8/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. IndexGPT leads by 7.4 points. IndexGPT is a research tool with 22 stars. stable-hash is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.

requests — Nerq Trust Score 78.8/100 (B+). httpx — Nerq Trust Score 80.8/100 (A-). httpx leads by 2.0 points.

64.2
C
Categoryresearch
Stars22
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation0
vs
56.8
D
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm_full
Compliance100

Detailed Score Analysis

Dimensionrequestshttpx
Security90/10090/100
Maintenance100/100100/100
Popularity100/100100/100
Quality55/10065/100
Community35/10035/100

Five-dimension Nerq trust breakdown (registries: pypi / pypi). Scored equally weighted across security, maintenance, popularity, quality, community.

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric IndexGPT stable-hash
Trust Score64.2/10056.8/100
GradeCD
Stars220
Categoryresearchuncategorized
Security0N/A
Compliance87100
Maintenance1N/A
Documentation0N/A
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

IndexGPT leads with a trust score of 64.2/100 compared to stable-hash's 56.8/100 (a 7.4-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. IndexGPT scores 0 and stable-hash scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. IndexGPT: 1, stable-hash: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. IndexGPT: 0, stable-hash: N/A.

Community & Adoption

IndexGPT has 22 GitHub stars while stable-hash has 0. IndexGPT has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose IndexGPT if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (22 vs 0 stars)

Choose stable-hash if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from IndexGPT to stable-hash (or vice versa)

When migrating between IndexGPT and stable-hash, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: IndexGPT (research) and stable-hash (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the IndexGPT safety report and stable-hash safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: IndexGPT has 22 stars and stable-hash has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
IndexGPT Safety Report stable-hash Safety Report IndexGPT Alternatives stable-hash Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, IndexGPT or stable-hash?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, IndexGPT has a trust score of 64.2/100 (C) while stable-hash scores 56.8/100 (D). The 7.4-point difference suggests IndexGPT has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do IndexGPT and stable-hash compare on security?
IndexGPT has a security score of 0/100 and stable-hash scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. IndexGPT's compliance score is 87/100 (EU risk: minimal), while stable-hash's is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use IndexGPT or stable-hash?
The choice depends on your requirements. IndexGPT (research, 22 stars) and stable-hash (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, IndexGPT scores 64.2/100 and stable-hash scores 56.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-31 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy